Monday, October 1, 2012

Black Male Atrocities Since 1964 - White Victims (Oct. 2012)


(Main Menu Page For All Blogs )



Sept. Atrocity>>>CLICK HERE                                       Nov. Atrocity>>> CLICK HERE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We now move to our October 2012 addition to staggering to imagination atrocities committed by black males against innocent white people.  The brutal atrocity below involves an innocent young white female who was abducted at gunpoint by a sexually depraved black male.  He took her back to his place, then, over the course of 3 or 4 days, raped, beat, tortured then murdered her.. 

--------------------------------------------------




San Angelo, TX, Feb. 18, 1995

White Female Is Kidnapped, Raped & Tortured For Days - Then Murdered
Member of US military
A black male, Louis Jones, 45 …staked out a laundromat on a US military base and waited for an opportunity to  abduct a young white female.  When Jones saw the opportunity he was waiting for, he charged into the laundromat and up to the female, pulled a gun then forced her outside and into the trunk of his car.  Jones then sped away…back to his home (an awaiting chamber of horrors). For three days (maybe more)  Jones, in the most depraved and sadistic ways imaginable, raped, beat, tortured, abused  and humiliated the young girl. When Jones was finally done with the white female, he retrieved a tire iron from his car, then beat her in head... until she was dead.


Victim:

* Tracy McBride, 19

Note: Since Tracie was a member of the US Military. Jones was tried and convicted in federal court and sentenced to death.  As Jones was strapped to the gurney in the death chamber, he never uttered one word of apology to the family of Tracie McBride.

Also, the McBride family received not ONE dollar of compensation for their daughter's death from the US gov't ... for being a victim of the social engineering experiment of Compulsory Inclusionism (created 1964).


   http://www.clarkprosecutor.org/html/death/US/jones837.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Double Feature Bonus



----------------------------------------------------------------------------


More

 'FAIR HOUSING ACT' 
Victims


Prior to the 1960s, white people protested bitterly regarding blacks moving into their residential communities. It wasn't just a loss of their property values that white people were worried about.  It was also a safety concern for their families. 

Fair Housing Act of 1968:  If integration was forced on the white population (civil-rights), would the black man take advantage of his new freedom of movement in the white communities and strike at innocent white people?  Naturally, the white males that were creating the forced integration laws believed blacks (males specifically) would NOT take advantage and strike at the innocent...who were made to let their guard down. Time would tell...
-----------
----------- -----------

San Diego (Clairemont and University City), CA, 1990 - 1991


"The Clairemont Killer"



  Home Invasions - Serial Rapist And Murderer

Cleophus Prince, 23, is a black male who used civil rights laws to rape and murder white females.  He was finally captured on March 1, 1991.

"He was caught when a woman who was getting ready to shower heard someone picking her door lock. She escaped from a rear window and found a friend who came and confronted Prince. He excused himself, but the description led to his arrest. After his arrest, DNA connected him to the murder of Janene Weinhold, and that murder connected him to the others by the pattern presented by the murders."  Wikipedia

Let me translate the highlighted portion above.  Prince had staked out the female's place. He knew she lived alone and he had familiarized himself to her daily routine. He also  familiarized himself with her home, like where the shower/bathroom window was. Killing six white female's in their homes, Cleophus Prince was certainly a pro at stalking and picking the opportune time to strike. He waited for the female to come home -- likely from work.  He then periodically checked - from the outside - to see if the shower was running. When he heard it on, that's when he made his move.  By the way, one does have to wonder just how many white people saw this black man lurking about.

Victims (all murdered in their apartments):

* Tiffany Schultz, 21
* Janene Weinhold, 21 (raped)
* Holly Tarr, 18
* Elissa Keller, 38

* Pamela Clark, 42,(raped)
* Amber Clark, 18 (daughter)


Note Mr. Prince is currently residing on death row in California.


caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/californiastatecases/s036105.pdf

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Compulsory Inclusionism (Civil Rights) -Those Who Died So The Black Race Could Achieve Integration


MAIN MENU PAGE


"After the march [on Washington in 1963], many laws were passed to give blacks equal rights."

 People of African descent in America before 1964 were not an oppressed people. They were not being denied any Constitutional rights, nor were they being denied any rights created by Acts of Congress.1  One distinct people living separate from another distinct people was the established norm in American history. It was also the established norm throughout human history. The Negro people did in fact seek,  demand and ultimately receive integration rights into the established political and economic arenas of the White race (note: only the American Negro remonstrated before another people for integration rights, calling it the source of their freedom, their dignity and even the source of their very manhood).  It should also be noted that the Negro did not build any U.S. cities or towns in American history. Nor did they create any political systems. They also did not build any urban housing, build any industries or employ their own people (in 1960, more than 99% of all wage-earning black males worked for either the white tax base, white business/ corporation or a white household).


------------

   In 1910, the NAACP was born (created by White Christians) and thus was born the radical new concept of racial integration. By the mid-1950s, many Blacks - and quite a few White people as well - across America were working to achieve the “dream”, or the “eye on the prize”, which was across-the-board integration of the Black race into the political and economic environments of the White race.  During this great struggle, and, again, I feel compelled to add, a struggle which was completely unprecedented in the annals of human history,  there were more than a few who lost their lives as a result of this across-the-board integration pursuit by the Black race (oddly, into the very group they're also labeling at this time as their brutal oppressor). Un-officially, the “dream” pursuit began with the Montgomery Bus Boycott in 1955, and lasted through 1967. 2

Note: All the victims below appear on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s site ‘Civil Rights Martyrs’. LINK I also need to point out that Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), if you click on the link I provided, indicates many more victims than I've listed below. However, if you read the descriptions of how each died, you can see that (1) SPLC is clearly adding names of people (even a Black male rapist!) who obviously did not die in the pursuit of compulsory integration; (2) Blacks were added to their list perhaps to have more Black victims of the “dream” pursuit than White victims.

The names below are the actual murder victims (white and black) in the the pursuit of Compulsory Inclusionism.

1955 - Rev. George Lee -- (Belzoni, Mississippi)
* 1955 - Lamar Smith  -- (Brookhaven, Mississippi)
1961 - Herbert Lee -- (Liberty, Mississippi)
1963 - (w/m) William Lewis Moore  --(Attalla, Alabama)
1963 - Medgar Evers  --(Jackson, Mississippi)
1964 - (b/m) James Chaney, (w/m) Andrew Goodman and (w/m) Michael Schwerner -- (Philadelphia, Miss.)
1965 - Jimmie Lee Jackson  --(Marion, Alabama)
1965 - (w/m) Rev. James Reeb --(Selma, Alabama)
1965 - (w/f) Viola Gregg Liuzzo --(Selma Highway, Alabama)
1965 - (w/m) Jonathan Myrick Daniel --(Hayneville, Alabama)
1966 - (w/m) Vernon Ferdinand Dahmer --(Hattiesburg, Mississippi)
1967 - Wharlest Jackson --(Natchez, Mississippi)
** 1968 - Samuel Ephesians Hammond Jr., Delano Herman Middleton and Henry Ezekial Smith
*** 1968 - Martin L. King

* There is no existing evidence - other than the SPLC's claim - that Lamar Smith was murdered because he was participating in, or an advocate of, the black race's compulsory inclusionism demands. Nevertheless, I decided to include his name. You can judge for yourself whether he should be included in this victims list.

** The three Blacks were killed by police officers during a mostly Black mob protest against a segregated bowling alley. However, it should also be noted that preceding the police officers opening fire on the protesters, was a violent assault on a White officer. The year 1968  was the beginning of the ‘Black Power’ movement, which advocated violence toward White people and, particularly, White police officers.

*** King died after two of the compulsory integration laws were already passed (Civil Rights Act 1964, Voting Rights Act 1965).  The compulsory integration 'Housing' law followed a couple moths later i.e. Fair Housing Act.

-------------------------

Total number of people who died to achieve the compulsory integration “dream”was 14.
Total Blacks who died:: 7 (not including the three who were killed in 1968)
                       Total White people who died:: 7

------------------------------------------------------------------------

1.   There were a few voting irregularities in the Deep South prior to 1964 (e.g Mississippi, Arkansas, Texas). However, in 1963,  more than 43% of eligible blacks were registered to vote across the South.

2.  In 1956 racial segregation on buses was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court - who were all White male justices.

Wednesday, August 8, 2012

George Stinney - An Atrocity Being Rewritten




Yet ANOTHER black-on-white atrocity that is being rewritten... Claiming George was 'railroaded' by racist southern white people.  -- No he was NOT!
                                              
George Stinney

March 23, 1944, Clarendon County, S . Carolina --

      The Atrocity:  Two American girls, one 8-years-old and the other 11-years-old,  were picking flowers when they were approached by a 14-year-old Negro boy, George Stinney.  Apparently, when the Negro boy became insistent on sex with the 11-year-old and, of course, the girl flatly refused, both girls tried to leave.  In a fit of anger, George, who had a railroad spike in his hand,  which he picked up while tracking the girls to their location, started beating both girls... until they were dead.  He then sexually abused the dead corpses.

       Note: When the prosecutor called on the medical examiner to testify if any of the girls had been sexually violated, he refused  to "rule it out."  Since George's sole intent for approaching the white girls was sexual in nature ... it's only logical that George would have violated the dead, or dying,  girls. If George was sadistic enough to kill two little girls, he certainly was capable of any vile act.

    After Stinney was through with his sordid amusement with the two girls,  he dragged the bodies to a shallow pond and pushed them into it. He then retrieved the girl's bike and the murder weapon and tossed them into the same pond. Stinney then calmly walked away from the macabre scene he had created,  and never once from then on did he exhibit even the slightest modicum of guilt or remorse for what he had done to those two girls.

       George's sister rats him out... Well, not exactly. During the hunt for the missing girls, George participated.  When George mentioned he and his sister had not only seen the missing girls but also talked to them, the police, naturally,  wanted to talk to George and his sister.  When police did talk to the two Negro children,  George's sister told them that the two white girls, who were on a bicycle,  had stopped and asked her and her brother if they knew where to find a particular type of flower.  George's sister told them she did, and then told them where to find the flowers.  The Negro girl then told the officers that as the girls rode away...George went in the direction of the girls.   One can only imagine at this point the officers looking squarely at George...then asking him why he left and in the same direction as the girls?  One can next imagine that George must have just stood there speechless. George was taken into police custody for further questioning.  Note: George first denied any knowledge of the crime.  However, caught in his own web of deceit, he then tried to convince the officers that the girls had attacked him and he had to defend himself.  Since George obtained a weapon (a railroad spike) before he approached the little girls, that defense also didn't work.  George, finally out of options, was left with telling the officers what really happened, which was transcribed by deputy Newman.

     Deputy Newman's Interrogation notes:
"I was notified that the bodies had been found. I went down to where the bodies were at.  I found Mary Emma she was rite [sic] at the edge of the ditch with  four or five wounds on her head, on the other side of the ditch the Binnicker girl, were [sic] laying there with 4 or 5 wounds in her head,  the bicycle the girls had were beside the little Binnicker girl. By information I received I arrested a boy by the name of George Stinney ...  he then made a confession and told me where a piece of iron about 15 inches long were, he said he put it in a ditch about 6 feet from the bicycle which was lying in the ditch."



   Note the blue-highlighted portion of George's confession ...  it is ironclad proof that George committed the murders, for only the true perpetrator would have known the whereabouts of the murder weapon. Further, the fact that George picked up a railroad spike and brought it with him to confront the white girls demonstrated premeditation i.e. George knew what he was going to do if he didn’t get his way… long before he walked up on the little girls.

   There was little George's defense attorney could do, since George provided a detailed confession to the crime. His attorney decided to use the  'he's-too-young-to-be-held-accountable-for-his-actions'  defense. The all-American jury didn't buy it.  George Stinney was convicted of the double murders and, since George had reached legal adult age in South Carolina (14-years-old),  the judge gave him the same sentence he would have given to any adult who had committed such a mind-numbing atrocity:: death in the electric chair. George was executed 81 days after his conviction.

>>> Of further note,  George's own parents never publicly proclaimed their son was innocent of the double murders, nor does a single newspaper account exist with them pleading for justice from the "racist" southern judicial system.  And finally,, the NAACP, an organization that certainly one would expect to have gotten involved in this case if there was even the slightest hint of racial prejudice,   malfeasance or foul play, not only didn't they get involved (they provided no lawyers ... nor was there any write-up in their Crisis magazine condemning the "racists" southerners), but also all the way up to and after the execution, never claimed George Stinney was innocent.<<<

Innocent White Girls:
* Mary Emma Thames, age 8
 * Betty June Binnicker, 11

Note: If you go to wikipedia, you will find this :

"Stinney (90 lbs, 5'1") wanted to "have sex with" 11 year old Betty June Binnicker and could not do so until her companion, Mary Emma Thames, age 8, was removed from the scene; thus he decided to kill Mary Emma..."

This is really an outrageous and disgusting implication here people (!),  implying the 11-year-old white girl was willing to have sex with the black boy. Note: I have changed this despicable quote on wikipedia, as well as many other descriptions implying racist white people were deliberately trying to railroad an innocent 14-year-old black boy.  My version states without an agenda ... and represents what was indicated in the notes of deputy Newman, and has stood as the truth to this case for over 65 years.  We'll see how long it last. 

UPDATE:: My 'non-agenda'  version lasted two days!  The original 'evil-and-racist-white people-done-George-wrong' version is back up.  

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Stinney#cite_note-jones-2
Google Book Source

http://thegrio.com/2011/09/28/was-the-youngest-person-ever-executed-innocent/

Thursday, July 26, 2012

Rosewood Massacre (1923) - The Real Truth


---------------



Rosewood :Fiction & Fact

--------------------------------------------------

The Rosewood incident  began January 1st, 1923, and eventually culminated with the burning of the small predominantly Negro town six days later. And though the Rosewood riots were unquestionably racially motivated, it should also be noted that these types of  incidents were very rare in American history. Between 1900 and 1964, there were only 31 (at least, that's all I could find >>Link).  And of those 31 ... 77% were a direct consequence of - provoked by - either a sexual assault or a murder (usually a police officer).

Note: There was no "massacre"  in any of the two Rosewood riots.



Archived newspaper article supporting this version
...LINK
----------------------------

Now let’s get to the 1923 Rosewood Riots: Fiction & Fact


Fiction: The town of Rosewood (Florida) in 1923 was an entirely Negro town and boasted a population of about 300 or more.

   Fact: Rosewood was described as “mostly African-American”, therefore, there were some Americans living in the community. In the book The Chronological History of the Negro,  a far left-leaning, pro-integration recounting of African-American experiences from the 1700s and up until 1968, tells us there were “six buildings” burned down in the town (the town had just recently been vacated due to news of impending mob violence).  And after the buildings were burned, then, a few days later, “the 12 remaining structures” were burned. These 12 structures were obviously residences (homes) in the African-American part of the small community. Doing the simple math here, it tells us that most likely there were only 12 African-American families in Rosewood. The typical African-American family back then would have consisted of about six or seven. That would put the African-American population of Rosewood at approximately 80, with the adult male population at around 12 to 14.

Note: Despite Wikipedia's claim (produced from a thoroughly unreliable source, African-American Maxine Jones) that Sumner and Rosewood had a combined population of "344 blacks and 294 whites," I could find no existing census data to support this claim.  Rosewood shared a census tract with Sumner, so there is no way of knowing exactly how many people (white or black) lived in Rosewood.  However, the "12 structures", or homes, in the black section give a pretty accurate clue. Whites were likely about half or less of the black population in Rosewood, so the white population would be about 30 or 40 (6 or 7 families) ... and the total Rosewood population (white & black) would be around 120.

Of further note: I'm assuming that the white mob only burned the black homes. However, all reports of the Rosewood riots state that the town was destroyed. So it could also be that the 12 structures were the total of homes in Rosewood.  So, using that as the number of homes, of course, the size of the population of Rosewood would be radically reduced.  For example, if one were to assume eight of the structures belonged to African-American, and the remaining four were occupied by Americans, that would put the approximate size of the black population at around 50, with about 7 or 8 adult black males; the white population would be around 35. The total Rosewood population in this scenario would be about 85 people.  I'm also assuming (no way to find the actual number) that all 12 structures were occupied by families on January 1st.

Archived newspaper account of what happened. LINK

------

Fiction:  From Wikipedia:  South Florida had imposed legal racial segregation under Jim Crow laws, requiring separate black and white public facilities and transportation.[6] Blacks and whites created their own community centers: in 1920, the residents of Rosewood were mostly self-sufficient. They had three churches, a school, a large Masonic Hall, a turpentine mill, a sugarcane mill, a baseball team named the Rosewood Stars, and two general stores, one of which was white-owned.


Fact:  "Jim Crow laws" : South Florida, as well as the entire country, was actually operating under Plessy  v. Ferguson (1896 Supreme Court decision allowing for the separation of the races). One distinct people living separate from another distinct people was the established norm in America at that time. It was also the established norm throughout human history.  Blacks were a free people, free to build their own towns, their own cities and their own industries; or colonize a place in the vast expanse of unsettled land in America (e.g., like the Mormons).  Regarding the buildings in Rosewood, this has already been covered. There were "six buildings" burned.  The quote above indicates there were nine structures in Rosewood that were not homes. The existing structures in Rosewood at that time were: two churches (white and black); two schools (white and black); a likely abandoned turpentine mill; and only one daily operating business in Rosewood, which was the general store operated by a white male (John Wright).

------

  Fiction: The railroad stopped in Rosewood.


   Fact:  The railroad did not have a regularly scheduled stop in Rosewood in 1923. And why would it? The only industry in the area, the timber industry, had moved more than two decades earlier to Sumner. There was also no hotel and no business activity (one general store) in Rosewood..

------

   

Fiction: All the African-Americans who formerly lived in Rosewood had remained silent about the incident over all these years (1923 to 1982) because they decided that it was just such a terrible event ... they would all just blot it out from their memories.


Fact:   When the news of impending mob violence reached Rosewood,  all African Americans fled the small town, with the exception of Mrs. Carrier , a couple young kids (actual number unknown) and the African-American fugitive (Jesse Hunter).  Since Mrs. Carrier and the fugitive died in a hail of gunfire from the posse, and the kids were too young to recall what happened, there were no other African-Americans left in the tiny town as eyewitnesses to report on the incident.  

 

------

                      

  Fiction:  An American female, Mrs. Fannie Taylor, was in fact attacked and beaten up... but made up a story about an African-American male doing it.  Why? Because the brutal attack was really perpetrated by her  “white” male lover (i.e. she was having an affair) and she knew she would have to explain the bruises to her husband when he arrived home from work.  Hence, the “made-up story”.

   Fact :

 1.) On the day of the home invasion / assault, an African-American male, Jesse Hunter, had escaped from a prison work detail in the vicinity of Rosewood. The fugitive would have been penniless and, naturally, in need of money to get out of the Rosewood area.  Strong-arming a young American female home alone would be an obvious source to obtain some quick money.


 2.) The source for the story of the alleged “white guy” seen coming out of Fannie Taylor's home came from an African-American Arnett Doctor. He wasn't alive at the time of the Rosewood incident.  He told a white male journalist, Gary Moore, that his mom, Philomena Goins, who would have been 7 years old at the time of the incident, told him all about how she and her mother, Sarah Carrier, witnessed the white lover leaving Mrs. Taylor's premises on the day of the assault.   Note:  Gary Moore and Arnett Doctor's  "new" version to Rosewood was created in 1982.  

Reality check... The new version of the Rosewood incident has Fannie Taylor beaten up by her "white lover," then he flees toward Rosewood (about 3 miles away). Here are the only two possible scenarios - that I can think of - where Fannie Taylor would run to the sheriff and report an erroneous assault on her by a black man.


Scenario 1: After the beating by her white lover, Fannie Taylor looks in the mirror and notices bruises she knows she cannot explain to her husband, so she and the white male cook up a story where she intends to frantically run to the sheriff and tell him a black man beat her and robbed her. Well, if this is the scenario, then why is the white male fleeing? He has nothing to worry about. He knows Fannie is blaming a black man. Right? Hmmm. Maybe the white male walked the three miles to Rosewood. Possible.


Scenario 2: The white male strikes Fannie Taylor. Furious, Fannie Taylor tells her white lover she's going to the sheriff and report him, then storms out of the house. However, along the way, Fannie decides against blaming the assault on her white lover and instead hurriedly concocts a story about a black man beating her. Again, though, why would the white male be fleeing for his life? He has nothing to really fear. There were no domestic violence laws back then, so a female being struck by a male in a lover's quarrel would not be an arrestable offense. Also, the white male, one could logically expect, would quickly figure out that if Fannie Taylor did report her beating to the sheriff, this would reveal to everyone, including her husband, that she is having an affair! And what would that mean in 1923? Scandal! Divorce! Ostracizing!   So under this scenario as well, one would expect the white male lover to flee.  But it certainly would have been time for him to leave her premises.  Again, maybe he walked toward Rosewood.


Both of the above scenarios, in my opinion, are actually equally implausible. In fact, no scenario can be created to provide a logical reason for the white male to flee for his life toward Rosewood. The only plausible scenario as to who beat up Fannie Taylor is the original version: An escaped convict, Jesse Hunter, invaded Fannie Taylor's home, beat her up (possible rape) , made her reveal where any household money was, then he fled toward Rosewood.  And one final thing to consider: When Gary Moore heard this fantastic new version to Rosewood from Arnett Doctor, who, again, was claiming he was reciting what his mother told him about the event,  why didn't Gary Moore go straight to the source i.e. the mother? WHY?? Read below:

" [Philomena Goins] Doctor called her family members [after Arnett Doctor and Gary Moore's new version of Rosewood was published in 1982] and declared Moore's story and Ed Bradley's television exposé were full of lies."

wikipedia

The alleged affair in the new version is simply not to be believed.

------

Fiction: Six African-Americans, perhaps many more, were murdered; many being lynched. Also, sadistic white people would cut off the body parts of the blacks and take them home for souvenirs.

Fact: Four African-Americans died, two adult males and two adult females: Sam Carter; Mrs. Sarah Carrier; Jesse Hunter;  Miss Lexie Gordon. There were no lynchings (hangings) in these "riots", which occurred over the following two days. None of the four blacks were dismembered for souvenir body parts.

   Day 1, Jan.1st : A couple of hours after the assault, an American posse with bloodhounds tracked a scent from Fannie Taylor's home to a home in Sumner, which belonged to an African-American male, Sam Carter. This piece of information (which is beyond dispute) is of vital importance.  Where did the bloodhounds get the scent they tracked to Mr. Carter’s home? They got that scent from the clothes of Fannie Taylor that the African-American male left on it when he physically assaulted her. The bloodhounds, able to track a human scent up to 36 hours after it was left, had no trouble tracking the scent to Mr. Carter’s place (no, these dogs were not bred by white people to be racists toward blacks).  At Mr. Carter's home is where the scent stopped. The group of armed Americans, therefore, had no other conclusion to draw than Mr. Carter had met with and aided the fugitive to escape by wagon.  A rope was tied around Mr. Carter's neck and he was threatened with being hanged if he didn’t reveal what he knew. However, Mr. Carter remained uncooperative and, much to the consternation of the mob, an American (unknown ) shot and killed him with a single gunshot to the body (or head). Mr. Carter was left where he fell and the mob moved on (Mr. Carter was NOT hanged).

From the official coroner's jury inquest, 1923:

"We the Jury after the examination of the said Sam Carter who being found lying Dead, find that the said Sam Carter came to his Death by being shot by Unknown Party so say we all."(1)

  Day 2, Jan 4th :  In the evening hours, hearing rumors that the African-American fugitive was at a house in Rosewood, a small group of armed Americans (no way of knowing how many) descended on the home of Mrs. Sarah Carrier (an African-American). Two American males went to the front door and knocked loudly, demanding that everyone inside come out.  NOTE:  This is where the known evidence of what follows ends. What did happen here, however, is really the most important aspect related to the burning of the African-American homes in Rosewood. The two white males who knocked on the Carrier front door were fact gunned down.  And it was this incident that set the stage for the torching of Rosewood.

  Most Likely scenario: At the home of Sarah Carrier, two Americans,  Henry Andrews, 42, and C. P. "Poly" Wilkerson, 45, knocked on the front door and demanded that everyone inside come out.  The fugitive, Jesse Hunter, is inside and likely holding a gun on Sarah Carrier (And how did Jesse Hunter get to the Carrier's home?  There's only one way he could have got there: Sam Carter [gunned down three days earlier]  took him there by wagon to hide him).   When Sarah Carrier opened the door the Negro fugitive ambushed the two Americans, murdering them at point-blank range.  Gunfire immediately erupted from the posse and Mrs. Carrier was killed in a hail of bullets. The fugitive was also mortally wounded; however, he still returned fire. After a period of time, the posse members, running low or out of ammunition, and also not sure if the fugitive was actually dead, decided to leave and return the next day. Upon returning the following day the two dead Americans are claimed.  Inside the Carrier home are two dead bodies:  Sarah Carrier and an adult Negro male.

Note: There is no known source that has positively identified the adult African-American male found dead in the Carrier home.  The 'new version' of this event claims that the victim is Sylvester Carrier (son of Sarah Carrier). Naturally, this would create a scenario where Mr. Carrier is simply defending his house and avenging the senseless slaughter of his mother by sadistic and bloodthirsty white guys.  However, a few questions arise with this version: Why would members of the posse gun down Sarah Carrier for no reason, and a woman some of the posse members were likely acquainted with?  Why would Sylvester Carrier gun down two white males on his front porch that he likely knew for years?   Why would Sylvester Carrier risk the lives of his mother and the children in the house ... by provoking a gunfight with a posse?  In my opinion, the new version - that Sylvester Carrier was defending his house - just doesn't seem logical.  The only logical version that does fit is that the rumor was true that the fugitive was inside the Carrier home ... and he (Jesse Hunter) slaughtered the two Americans.

  Day 3, Jan. 5th. :  A large group of Americans (no way of knowing how many) set fire to six buildings in the Negro section of Rosewood.  These were not homes.  No person (white or black) was killed or injured in this incident.

  Day 4, Jan. 7th :  To avenge the slaughter of the two white males, white people from nearby towns gathered in Rosewood and burned the remaining 12 structures - specifically the 12 African-American homes.  An African-American female, who was apparently suffering from typhoid fever and was bedridden, was burned alive, or escaped the house but died of smoke inhalation, when her house was set afire. Most likely, the ones setting the fire were not aware she was inside.

Note: Wikipedia's version states that a black male was “shot in the face” and then “hung…”.  This alleged incident first appears after 1982 in the “new version' of Rosewood, which was manufactured by Gary  Moore, a white male “self-employed” (unemployed?) freelance writer.

------

Fiction: One African-American is known to have been forced to dig is own grave before he was killed. Another African-American male, Mingo Williams, minding his own business and doing some hunting, was gunned down when he was spotted by some white males who were driving to Rosewood (Jan.7th).

Fact: The African-American male being forced to dig his own grave was said to be James Carrier.  The newspaper account of this incident tells us that James Carrier was shot days after Rosewood was burned. Americans most likely blamed him - one would assume on provable evidence - that he was directly or indirectly involved in the shooting deaths of the two American posse members. There is also NO existing credible evidence - that I can find -   that a group of Americans gunned down an African-American male who was out hunting.

------

So let’s sum up what we have as to the true and ironclad facts concerning Rosewood :

1.  An American female was attacked and beaten up by an African-American male. There is nothing I can find in the way of credible evidence that states the female was raped. However, there is evidence that states that members of the posse hunting for the African-American fugitive believed the woman was raped. 

2. All credible evidence points to the perpetrator of the attack on Fannie Taylor being an African-American male who had just escaped from a nearby prison work crew (Jesse Hunter).

  3. According to the book Chronological History of the Negro (published in 1969), and whose sources were newspaper accounts from the Rosewood riots period, stated "four Negroes and two white people were killed."  Only ONE African-American male (Mr. Sam Carter) is known to have been deliberately shot and killed by someone who was certainly an American (white). Three more African-Americans, Mrs. Sarah Carrier, fugitive Jesse Hunter,  and Miss Lexie Gordon, were also killed.  Sarah Carrier and Jesse Hunter died in the Carrier home from a hail of gunfire from the posse ... after two American posse members were massacred - ambushed.  The other African-American, a female, Lexie Gordon, stricken with typhoid fever and bedridden, died by fire or smoke inhalation when her home was set afire. 

  4. Because an African-American gunned down two Americans, this caused a fury among the local American population, and they took out their rage against the physical structures belonging to African-Americans in Rosewood: six buildings were burned, then, a few days later, 12 African-American homes were burned.

5.  Mr. Sylvester Carrier, whose mother died inside their home, presumably in a hail of gunfire after the killing of the two Americans, according to Arnett Doctor, Mr. Carrier was still alive after the Rosewood incident.  Arnett Doctor claims his family received Christmas cards from Sylvester many years after the incident. 

>>>> Proof that Sylvester Carrier was NOT defending his house against white males trying to break his door down: "Arnett Doctor [son of Philomena Goins Doctor - whose grandmother was Mrs. Carrier and killed by the posse], in his interview for the report given to the Florida Board of Regents, claimed that his mother received Christmas cards from Sylvester Carrier until 1964"  <<<<   Ergo, Sylvester Carrier was alive and well after the Rosewood incident.  In other words, he was not the black male lying dead in the house with his mother.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosewood_massacre   (notes)

So, who was the dead African-American male on the floor with Sarah Carrier?  It had to be the African-American fugitive Jesse Hunter.  

  6. Two other deaths allegedly related to the Rosewood burning were added after 1984 - likely so those surviving family members could cash in on any settlement that was in the works.


7.
The new version to the Rosewood incident was created in 1982 by a freelance reporter, (white male) Gary Moore. Moore relied on Arnet Doctor as his only source. Arnett was the son of Philomena Goins Doctor, who was 7-years-old at the time of the Rosewood incident. Arnett claimed that his mother told him all about the Rosewood incident. However, Arnett’s mother accused him of lying.

" [Philomena Goins] Doctor called her family members [after watching 60 Minutes recreate Arnet Doctor and Gary Moore's 'new version' of Rosewood] and declared Moore's story and Ed Bradley's television exposé were full of lies." wikipedia

------

1. http://afgen.com/roswood