Sunday, September 4, 2011

The Pink Franklin Case & The NAACP

      The Pink Franklin case is most noted for being the NAACP's first legal challenge on behalf of the Negro race. 

     The Case: (Orangeburg county, S. Carolina):   In 1907, Pink Franklin, 21, a Negro day laborer (some versions claim he was sharecropper), agreed to preform work and signed a labor contract for which he was paid up front.  When Mr. Franklin failed to show up to preform his agreed upon work, the employer holding his contract swore out a warrant for his arrest. Constable Henry Valentine decided to wait for Mr. Franklin to voluntarily come in and pay back what he owed.  After two months of waiting for Mr. Franklin to come in and settle up, which Mr. Franklin failed to do, the constable finally decided he had to act. The constable, along with another man, Constable W.M. Carter, (both Americans) went to Mr. Franklin's home at around 3 a.m.  (since day laborers would leave for work at the crack of dawn, this was not an unusual time).  Once there they waited until daybreak to approach the Franklin home.  The constable obtained the assistance of a neighbor of Mr. Franklin, a white male, who was also his current employer. The ruse was was to offer work to Mr. Franklin and hopefully with the offer of work, lure Mr. Franklin out of his shanty. However, Mr. Franklin refused the work and stayed in his home, whereupon Constable Valentine decided to enter the home and there make the arrest.  Apparently, the front door was left ajar when the neighbor left the premises. The constable, after rapping on the front door with a "metal object" (likely his pistol) and shouting his presence, which produced no reply,  proceeded into the home.  Mr. Franklin then suddenly emerged with his gun and shot Constable Valentine. The constable, however, though mortally wounded,  was still  able to get a round off himself, which struck Mr. Franklin in the shoulder.  After shooting constable Valentine, Franklin then turned his gun to the rear door, where Constable Carter went to prevent an escape, and continued to fire.  Constable Carter wound up seriously wounded by Franklin's gunfire. Mr. Franklin's wife was also wounded  though apparently by her husband's wild shooting.   Mr. Franklin, along with his wife, were both arrested for the murder of the constable and wounding of Constable Carter.  1

    Pink Franklin, who was represented by Negro attorneys, pleaded self-defense, claiming the constable failed to identify himself before entering his home; and that he (Mr. Franklin) feared it was a burglar and therefore had the right to protect himself and his family.  After an all-American jury was selected, the prosecutor presented his case, which was fairly straightforward and simple: (1) Even though it was early morning, Mr. Franklin was already awake and in a full conscience state; (2) the constable rapped loudly on the front door with a metal object and identified himself as he walked into Mr. Franklin’s house; (3) Mr. Franklin knew someone was at his front door, which is why he retrieved his gun  (and by the voice announcing his presence, Franklin had to realize it was a white male).

    The all-American jury certainly had to be aware that Mr. Franklin was aware that taking money for a job and not fulfilling his obligation would constitute theft,  and therefore he should have expected the constable to be coming to his residence to arrest him. The  jury also didn't believe Mr. Franklin's obvious tall tale about defending himself from a white burglar -- indeed,  just what on earth would a white male burglar hope to find of value in the tiny home of Mr. Franklin, a marginally employed day-laborer? When the jury returned with their verdicts,  Mrs. Franklin was acquitted of all charges. However, Mr. Franklin, the jury decided, intentionally ambushed the constable with the intent to murder him.  He was held accountable for his actions and found guilty of murder.  The judge sentenced him to death.  In essence, the all-American jury refused to pity Mr. Franklin; nor did the judge. But this was the pre-compulsory integration South.  And in the South at this time the prevailing general attitude among Americans was that the Negro simply was not to be pitied because of his race.  However, the NAACP had just come into existence (dominated by northern Christian socialists, who called themselves “progressives”) … and they were in fact demanding pity based on color - even if it involved murder.  
 
    In 1910, Mr. Franklin’s case came to the attention of an American named Albert Pillsbury, who was an attorney willing to do pro bono work for the NAACP.  The Franklin case represented a scenario that would play itself out countless times over the course of the next 50 years for the NAACP, where they, in obvious efforts to curry favor among the black race, always would side with blacks, criminal or civil cases, and imply that the black man, or the black race, was getting taken advantage of, hoodwinked or bamboozled by the too often racist, inhumane and heartless American population (i.e. white Christian males).  

  Albert Pillsbury, along with another American, Oswald Garrison Villard, Treasurer of the NAACP, petitioned the Governor of South Carolina for clemency for Mr. Franklin. Frances Blascoer, a Secretary for the  NAACP, also traveled to S. Carolina to persuade Mr. Franklin's Negro attorneys to allow the NAACP to represent Mr. Franklin before the S. Carolina Supreme Court.2    Mr. Villard petitioned Booker T. Washington as well to get involved in this case, but he showed no interest in it (no prominent Negro men seemed willing to come to Mr. Franklin’s aid - at least there is no existing record of their efforts). The Governor of South Carolina, Martin Ansel, whether persuaded by the NAACP or other fellow Americans, did commute Mr. Franklin’s sentence to life in 1911.   Mr. Franklin was paroled for "good behavior" in 1919 by the new [American] governor of South Carolina, Richard I. Manning. 

12 years for the intentional murder of a white man?!  It seems the cruel, heartless and inhumane Americans that the NAACP was claiming took advantage of the black man everywhere, well, really wasn't quite everywhere.  

-----------------------------------------

1. The Crisis Magazine's version states, which was a version likely created by the Negro defense attorneys, that the constable "barged" into Franklin's tiny home, then, without uttering a word, made his way to the bedroom, and upon seeing Mr. Franklin and his wife, immediately opened fire. This version should be regarded as nonsense. Common sense tells us the constable, entering a darkened home, would certainly have announced his presence - and more than once.  Also of note is that Franklin could have shouted to the white person that he that he had a gun, which Franklin clearly did NOT do. Why?  While no one knows exactly what happened in the Franklin home that early morning, reasonable common sense tells us that Franklin intentionally ambushed the constable. The prosecutor, the jury and the judge all believed this to be the case. And if you would like to see many many examples of the negro ambushing white people, here is a link.    LINK

2. There is also a claim that Secretary Blascoer met with the Governor of South Carolina on Mr. Franklin's behalf. Highly unlikely, as the Governor would not have known of the existence of the newly formed NAACP.  I'm also skeptical of the claim that the NAACP hired lawyers for Mr. Franklin, as the organization at that time had no money to do such a thing. 


http://www.paperlessarchives.com/the_crisis.html
archived newspaper account LINK

Thursday, August 11, 2011

Prison and Crime Records by Race (Black and White) Between 1904 and 1960


The above table is for the year 1904.   Blacks in this year are approximately 10% of the total US population.

 1904 = Blacks represent 32% of US prison population
                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                                           -----------------------------------------------------


 1923 prison breakdown by race...



In 1923, according to the gov't statistics above, blacks (including females) are 31% of America's prisoners (figure includes those present in county jails).  Blacks are slightly less than 10% of US total population.


                                          ----------------------------------------------------
                                          -----------------------------------------------------

The tables below are for the years 1933 and 1934 and represents prisoners received from the courts for incarceration in state and federal institutions.




During the 1930s blacks were imprisoned at their lowest level - about 25% of the total people being sentenced. In other words, during the decade of the Great Depression,  poverty did NOT automatically produce crime.
                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                                           -----------------------------------------------------

                                        The above figures apparently do not include local jails.

In 1942, blacks would likely represent about 33% of the total US prisoners (not including local jails).  That would put the total number of imprisoned blacks in 1942 at about 50,000.


                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                                           -------------------------------------------------------

1950 and 1960, US prison by race




In 1950, black males are now  35% of US prison population (including local jails)

In 1960, black males are 38% of the total US prison population (local jails included). Calculating just federal and state inmate numbers, that would put the total number of blacks incarcerated  at about 87,000 - up from 50,000 in 1942.
                                       
 

                                                -----------------------------------------------------
                                                -----------------------------------------------------
What black males are being arrested for (1958):


  We are shown here for the first time what white people - in the 1950s - very likely already suspected regarding Negro violent crime. Black males are 10% of the US male population in 1958.

Arrests for the year 1958:

Rape:: 46% Black
Robbery:: 54% Black
Murder:: 61% Black
-----------------------------------------------------


1960


Was the Negro violent crime statistics just an anomaly for the year 1958? Below are 1960 stats.

 Note: Murder non-negligence implied intentional murder. Negligent homicide is a reduced charge, implying non-intent to murder the victim.

Year 1960

Rapes:: 52%  Black
Robbery:: 56% Black
Murder:: 56%  Black
------------------------------------------------

Here's something that you should find interesting.  In this following table, note the substantial drop in predatory crimes (rapes, robbery, murder) when black males live in a rural environment.

* Again, black males are 10% of the US male population.

Year 1960 (rural predatory crimes)

Rapes:: 19%  Black
Robbery:: 23% Black
Murder:: 37%  Black
------------------------------------------------

                                                                 --------------------------



----------------------------------------------





SOURCE


---------------------------------------------------






TABLE #230:   Year 1969


Rape:: 50% Black
Robbery:: 66% Black
Murder:: 65% Black



Table #312:     Year 1978

Rape:: 49% Black
Robbery:: 59% Black
Murder:: 59% Black


Blacks in 1978 were approximately 11% of America's population


-----------------------------------------

How violent has the black male become under the new Compulsory Inclusionism system?

From  1964 and 2011, black males in the age group of 15 to 35, which represents approximately 2.2% of America's population ,  committed more homicides than all the US war casualties during the entire 20th century.

451,295 Total Homicides attributable to black males from 1965 to 2011

  How the 451,295 was computed::  There were 843,543 homicides in the US between 1965 & 2011.  Blacks, on average,  have been arrested in the category for murder in every consecutive year from 1965 to 2011 at between 50% to  60%. I decided to use a mean ave. of 54.3% for black homicides from 1965 to 2011.  
So, 843,543 x .535 = 451, 295 


Breakdown of total US murders by decade:
1965 to 1970 US murders= 77, 800
1971 to 1980 US murders= 199,270 


1981 to 1995 US murders= 303, 769  
 

1995 to 2011 US murders= 262, 734 



Continuing to build this site...

Sunday, July 3, 2011

Black Males & Their Historical Crime Rates

Note: I'm going to break this blog into a two parts series.  


--Part I  will contain facts and statistics for the black males in the area of crime while the USA operated under the historic formula for a societal structure, which I will refer to, for lack of a better description, as the DMG Theorem. Link 


--Part II  will demonstrate what effect  Compulsory Inclusionism (Civil Rights Acts 1964, 65' and 68') has had on black male crime rates. 


>>>Blacks Lynching Blacks  - Truth About Lynching - LINK<<<
                          >>> Why Negro Were Lynched - LINK<<<


                                                   ----------------------------------------
Part I
                                                   ----------------------------------------  


 
    According to the U.S. Census for 1900 ... the Negro population was 8,833,994... and 87%  of the Negroes still lived in the South.   The total urban Negro population in America was 11%.  It was also around 1900 that industrialization was beginning its ascent in America.  By the end of the 1950s, the majority of America's blacks were now living in Anglo-created urban centers ( in 1960 ... 56% of Negroes in the South lived in cities, in the North, 96%,  and West, over 93% of Negroes lived in urban centers). 


  NEVER in human history had a single society experienced more economic prosperity than America did during the 1950s.  


In 1960, the American Negro population reached almost 19 million.  As of 1960:


-- there are 1,551 U.S. cities ...total number built by American Negroes: -0-
-- number of industries established by Negro males: -0-
-- number of tax bases created by Negro males capable of sustaining gov't services: -0-


-- total number of residential housing structures built by Negro males in major metropolitan centers: So minute statistically immeasurable

-- number of white males & females employed by a Negro and supporting a family: -0- (I have not found a single case)

--total number of Negro male registered businesses: 34,400 (in other words, only .0043 of all adult black males owned their own business in 1960-  all are mom & pop operations. Source: Chronological History of the Negro -pg 523)

-- total amount of monies generated by Negro businesses that contributed to the US tax base (1960): So minute statistically immeasurable/ inconsequential

-- number of Negroes employed by a white person (household/corporation/business) or the white tax base: 99% of all wage earning black males worked for a white business/ corporation, household or the white tax base (i.e. the tax base = monies generated from businesses & industries in 1960 by federal, state local governments).


Clearly the Negro race in American history up until 1960 had demonstrated demonstrably different behavioral characteristics when compared to White males. More specifically, while one race provided for themselves and their people within America's urban centers, the other discernibly failed to do so.  This failing is undoubtedly a  major  contributor to the urban Negro crime rates  represented  below. 

Note: Regarding no cities built by the Negro race, by contrast, in 1820 the American population (i.e. white people) was approx. 8.5 million , the approximate size of the Negro population in 1900,  and American males had already by then built 61 cities (2000 or more inhabitants). SOURCE

---------------------------------------------------


1898


 W.E.B Du Bois: 

"In the city of Philadelphia the increasing number of bold and daring crimes committed by Negroes [since 1890] has focused the city on this subject. There is a widespread feeling that something is wrong with a race that is responsible for so much crime, and that strong remedies are called for. One has but to visit the corridors of the public buildings, when the courts are in session, to realize the part played in law-breaking by the Negro."
    Book: The Philadelphia Negro - 1898  (pg. 241)


---------------------------------------------------


1. 

 Regarding rape:  The penalty for a rape conviction in the USA from 1900 to 1970,  particularly for a black male and the victim was white, was not always death.  It was most likely a lengthly prison term.  In the state of Virginia, for example, between 1900 and 1960, out of 288 rape cases involving black males raping white females, only 50 (22%) were executed by the state (17 were lynched).

http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-67829800.html
  ---------------------------------------------------
2.      
1904



Negro prison statistics for 1904...LINK


---------------------------------------------------

Comparison Of Negro And American Prisoners For Some Major US Cities For 1910
LINK  (pg, 80)

Even though only 11% of the Negro population was living in the American-built urban centers, note in the link above the great disparity in the incarceration rates of American (white) & Negro.

--------------------------------------------------
3.                  
1923 



 According to the far-left leaning Sentencing Project:

 "In 1926, for example, Black Americans comprised barely 21 percent of the prison population. But in each subsequent decade, with almost clock-work precision, the percentage has increased by an average of five percent."

Is this statement accurate? Let's check...  


  I cannot find prison figures for 1926 where there is a racial breakdown ( I would like to know the source used by The Sentencing Project, as I have pored over the gov't statistical abstracts- NOTHING); however, I did find prison records for 1923.  In 1923, according to the gov't statistics above, blacks (including females) are - oops - not 21% ... but rather 31% of America's prisoners (figure includes those present in county jails). So blacks in American prisons in 1923 - during the roaring 20s economic boom! - are disproportionately represented at more than 3 times their population count. No one should doubt that in 1926 blacks were represented at approximately the same percent in the prison system. 

Note: Between 1933 and 1939 black males were imprisoned at a rate of about 24% for each successive year.  

---------------------------------------------------
4.
1941 and 1943 




Between 1941 and 1943 blacks are - AGAIN -  being imprisoned at rate of approx. 30%.  

------------------------------------------------------- 
5.


1950 and 1960, US prison by race




In 1950, black males are now  35% of US prison population (including local jails).

In 1960, black males are 38% of the total US prison  population (local jails included).

--------------------------------------------------

6.                                
                                                          

Time Magazine 1958: The Negro Crime Rate : A Failure In Integration

                        http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,810262-1,00.html


NYC = Black 14% of city population. Of those arrested in 1957, 44% black males; 65% black female.

Chicago = Black 15% of city population. 49% of all the predatory crimes of rape, robbery and murder are attributed to blacks.

Los Angeles (city) = Black 13% of city population.  48% of all arrests for predatory crimes of rape, robbery and murder are attributed to blacks.

Detroit = Black 25% of city population.  In the county of Detroit, 66% of the person in its jail systems are black. Of all arrests in the county, 50% are black.

Wait a minute now.  For those of you you have been reading my blogs, you know Time Magazine's title 'The Negro Crime Rate : A Failure In Integration'   is a flagrant misnomer. Integration (by force) was created on July 2, 1964 (Civil Rights Act).  So the Negro males' crime rates represented  here cannot be a failure in integration. It is rather, a failure of the black male in urban centers. 

 ---------------------------------------------------

7.  

During the 1950s,  arguably the BIGGEST economic boom in all of human history is taking place, and it's taking place in America.  Yet, America's Negroes are not just faltering. They are withering is desolation and despair.  This, of course, is not a plot conceived by the white man.  White males were, and always had been,  the major source of employment for the Negro (male and female),  and also took it  upon themselves  - because the Negro would not or could not -  to built housing for them (public housing).  White males also provided through their tax base a welfare system to feed the Negroes who were hungry.  

Remember, the black race was supposed to be separate and self-reliant as a people i.e. they were SUPPOSED to build their own towns, cities, industries, tax base, create their own political titles, or, if they truly felt oppressed, colonize a place in America e.g. like the Mormons did.  One distinct people living separate from another distinct people was the established norm throughout human history.  

 
Journalist Theodore H. White describes life in Chicago for the Negro in 1956 as follows:

“… Fifteen to 25 per cent [Negroes] unemployed here; one quarter of [Negro] families in some [census] tracts without fathers; of 17,000 Negro births in Chicago, an estimated 4,000 illegitimate.”

“… of all the women in Chicago's county jail, 69 per cent are Negro; of all the men, 62 per cent; of all the forlorn on relief, 72 per cent Negro; of all the clients of public housing in Chicago, seeking shelter of the government, 70 per cent Negro. And in Detroit, Philadelphia, New York, kindred figures grimly repeat themselves.”
 
 http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/6331/
 ---------------------------------------------------
8.
1958


The page below is a copy taken directly from the Government Statistical Abstracts and is the earliest crime statistics I could find produced by the federal gov't which breaks down crime by race.

In 1958 Negroes were about 11% of the total US population.   We are shown here for the first time what white people in the 1950s very likely already suspected regarding Negro violent crime.  

Year 1958

Rape:: 46% Black
Robbery:: 54% Black
Murder:: 61% Black
------------------------------------------------

9.                


1960



Was the Negro violent crime statistics for the year 1958 just an anomaly ? Below are 1960 stats.

 Note: Murder non-negligence implied intentional murder. Negligent homicide is a reduced charge, implying non-intent to murder the victim.

Year 1960

Rapes:: 52%  Black
Robbery:: 56% Black
Murder:: 56%  Black


Here's something that you should find interesting.  In this following table, note the substantial drop in predatory crimes (rapes, robbery, murder) when black males live in a rural environment.

* Again, black males are 10% of the US male population.

Year 1960 (rural predatory crimes)

Rapes:: 19%  Black
Robbery:: 23% Black
Murder:: 37%  Black
-------------------------------------------------

10.      


1963



Between 1930 and 1963, of the 3833 executions carried out by states and the federal gov't :
--54%  were black.
--90% of all executions for Rape were black.   


 ---------------------------------------------------
11. 

The above statistics, as everyone can plainly see, show a very clear propensity on the part of the Negro male (between 1900 and 1960) to commit violent crimes, and particularly within urban centers. However,  let's keep this in mind:: 
  • the percentage of black males between 16 and 35 in the prison system was within the acceptable range for cooperation from a male group.1
Let's do the math.   First, let's take a look at the percentage of black & white males represented in the state and federal prison system in 1960 between the ages 16 to 35.  This age group (16 to 35) within any societal structure would have to cooperate to produce political  & economic stability ( at least that seems reasonable to me as these are the prime years ).  In 1960, the census reported the black population at approx. 18 million. That would mean that approx. 9 million black males lived in the US.  Of that 9 million about 40% would be between the age of 16 and 35 years-old.[1]     So, 40% of 9 million=3.6 million black males between 16 and 35.  Of that 3.6 million in 1960 ...  87,400  black males are in the US prisons (state and federal)That means that approx.  2.4 %  of black males in this age group (16 - 35) are incarcerated within federal & state prisons in the US. 2 

 For white males between 16 and 35, there were approx. 80 million white males total, and, using the same percentages above, 40% of 80 million = 32 million white male between 16 and 35. There were 162,000 white males in the state and federal prison in 1960. So, 162 (k) /32 (m)=.005.  In other words, only one half of one percent - .05% - of white males in our stated age group are incarcerated in state and federal prisons in 1960.   


Note: A "male group" are males racially, linguistically and religiously similar.

1.  While there is no generally accepted percentage for a male group to cooperate to maintain stability within a society, we can, however, look at the Continental Army during the American Revolution and at least get a rudimentary approximation as to what percentage of a male group who chose to no longer cooperate with the status quo, can result in the collapse of the political system (in our case, the British colonial system).  The American population in 1780 was approx. 2.7 million.  Half of that number would be males.  Using our 40% figure for males between 16 and 35, the age group that would comprise virtually the entire fighting force for the Continental Army, that would mean that there would be approx. 450,000 American males available to Washington to fight the British.  However, only about 20,000 of that number ever fought with Washington.  In other words, it took only about 4% of the males between 16 and 35 to bring down the whole British colonial system.  Again, blacks in 1960, their prison rate – non-cooperation rate - for the age group 16 to 35, is approx. 2.4%. White males, it’s at .005 approx. Ergo, for both male groups (white & black), both are in the acceptable cooperation range.

Note:  Negro males, with the exception of a few incidents,  did not fight in the Continental Army.


2.  I am factoring in the mean life expectancy for black & white male's between 1900 and 1960.  For blacks, it was about 55 years.  For whites, about 64 years.




-----------------------------------------------------------------------


PART II
-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Black Male Crime Statistics
Under  'New'
System
 (1964 to present)
                                        --------------------------------------------------

Why did American Negroes march down America's streets and demand integration rights into political and economic systems of a people (White Christians) they were also labeling as their brutal oppressor? Why didn't the Black race demand separation and autonomy?  All of human history suggests a people who claim they are brutally treated and oppressed by another...that's what they should do. But American Blacks didn't do that. They never did it. WHY?   Because Blacks wanted and received the biggest magnanimous gesture by one people toward another in human history:  the Black PRIVILEGE --AKA Civil Rights Laws.


The Black PRIVILEGE is embodied in America's civil rights laws ( passed into law by White Christian males) during the Johnson presidency.  Here are some of the PRIVILEGES bestowed on the Black race with the the federal  '64, '65 & '68 Civil Rights Acts.

What the Black race gets:

  • Claim instant access to all economic environments (occupational titles) created by White males
  • Claim instant access to all political environments created by White males 
  • Claim instant access to all residential communities created White males 
  • Receive affirmative action programs (launched in 1965, now includes federal, state & local contract set-asides,  hiring quotas, college admission double standards) 
  • Community development banks (to give loans to black start-up businesses - who have little or no start-up capital) 
  • Small Business Administration (federal agency that gives Blacks favorable treatment, which includes loans for start-up businesses where little or no capital is needed
  • Title VII  race-based lawsuits against White people's businesses and the White tax base 
(note: There was no constitutional right to racial integration, nor was there any historical precedent to it.  From 1900 to to 1964, no economic systems [industries or tax bases] were created by Negroes; nor were there any political systems established, nor were there any urban residential communities built by Negroes)

All of the above Black PRIVILEGES have been going on now for almost 50 years (1965 to 2014).  

When the Black race was given their  - unprecedented in human history -  PRIVILEGES through the civil rights laws (including affirmative action programs), no one should question White Christian males believed that by cooperating with these laws, they were doing something altruistic;  that White males, by not rebelling over the forced integration of their status environments, would allow the Blacks race the necessary income / resources to build their own communities, their own businesses, their own way of life...and finally achieve for the first time in their history in America...  a sense of self-reliance and empowerment as a distinct people.

So, its been 50 years now with all the above Black PRIVILEGES.  How has the Black race used these extraordinary PRIVILEGES to further empowerment and self-reliance for their people, as well as reduce their crime rates? 

Regarding black crime, suffice it to say, the violent crime categories did not go down, but we'll get into that a bit further down,  Two other things I've discovered merit pointing out over this time period (1964 to 2014), that, no doubt in my mind,  has had a profoundly contributory negative effect on the black race as a whole, and severely limited their ability as a racial group to produce self-reliance as a people;  and very likely also contributes to the crime problem so prevalent among the black race since 1964 : 

1) The failure of the Black race to produce businesses across America and employ people - like white males did and continue to do - leaves Black communities, particularly within urban centers, without legitimate economic opportunities. This lack of economic opportunities for black males within their own communities naturally produces too many idol Black males -- which, as one would expect, leads to criminal behavior (Black businesses employ less than  .072  of the total number of people employed in America).SOURCE::

2) Flight of the Black wealthy. No other race flees their own racial/ ethnic group like the African Americans.  Honestly,  does anyone know a multi-millionaire Black male or female who didn't do the Oprah Winfrey? the OJ Simpson? the Beyonce/ JZ?  the Jeremiah Wright? et al.    Just think for a moment ...how much economic activity the Black community is being deprived of by all the wealthy Blacks who flee...flee straight into the White community.

------------

12.

Total Homicides attributable to black males between 1965 to 2011...

 =451,295

How the 451,295 was computed::  There were 843,543 homicides in the US between 1965 & 2011.  Blacks, on average,  have been arrested in the category for murder in every consecutive year from 1965 to 2011 at between 50% to  60%. I decided to use a mean ave. of 54.3% for black homicides from 1965 to 2011.  
So, 843,543 x .535 = 451, 295 


Breakdown of total US murders by decade (derived from the US census):

1965 to 1970 US murders= 77, 800
1971 to 1980 US murders= 199,270 


1981 to 1995 US murders= 303, 769  
 

1995 to 2011 US murders= 262, 734 




SOURCE
---------------------------------------------------


13.
1969 to 1978






TABLE #230:   Year 1969


Rape:: 50% Black
Robbery:: 66% Black
Murder:: 65% Black


-----------------------------------------------------------

Table #312:     Year 1978

Rape:: 49% Black
Robbery:: 59% Black
Murder:: 59% Black


Blacks in 1978 were approximately 11% of America's population

----------------------------------------------------------
14.                     
1986

Note: Blacks are approx. 11% of US population in 1986.

"According to the FBI's Uniform Crime Report, in 1986 Blacks accounted for 46.5% of all arrests for violent crimes even though Blacks comprised 12%  of the US population.   Blacks accounted for 48% of the persons arrested for murder; 46.6% of all arrests for rape; 39.8% for assault . . . In 1986, of those person under 18 years of age, Blacks accounted for 54% of those arrested for violent crimes . . . the highest violent crime rates are demonstrated by young Black males. . . . Over 40% of all jail inmates throughout the nation are Black ...and the percentage is rapidly rising.  More young Black men died from homicide in one year (1977) than died in ten years in the Vietnam War "  SOURCE


---------------------------------------------------------
15.                                       
2005


EXPLOSION OF BLACK CRIME AGAINST WHITE PEOPLE 


Seattle Times: "In 2005, there were more than 645,000 victims of inter-racial violent crimes in the U.S.  In 90 percent of those crimes, black offenders attacked white people"  i.e. more than 580,000 white victims.



Source 

-----------------------------------------------
16.     
2013


2013  article by Pat Buchanan on race relations and black racism & crime:  

"In New York from January to June 2008, 83 percent of all gun assailants were black, according to witnesses and victims, though blacks were only 24 percent of the population. Blacks and Hispanics together accounted for 98 percent of all gun assailants.  Forty-nine of every 50 muggings and murders in the Big Apple were the work of black or Hispanic criminals."

Also, on RAPE from same article:

After researching the FBI numbers for "Suicide of a Superpower," this writer concluded: "An analysis of 'single offender victimization figures' from the FBI for 2007 finds blacks committed 433,934 crimes against whites, eight times the 55,685 whites committed against blacks. Interracial rape is almost exclusively black on white — with 14,000 assaults on white women by African Americans in 2007. Not one case of a white sexual assault on a black female was found in the FBI study."

SOURCE

----------------------------------------------



 Continuing to build this site...