Sunday, July 3, 2011

Black Males & Their Historical Crime Rates

Note: I'm going to break this blog into a two parts series.  


--Part I  will contain facts and statistics for the black males in the area of crime while the USA operated under the historic formula for a societal structure, which I will refer to, for lack of a better description, as the DMG Theorem. 


--Part II  will demonstrate what effect  Compulsory Inclusionism (Civil Rights Acts 1964, 65' and 68') has had on black male crime rates

                                                   ----------------------------------------
                                                               Part I
                                                   ----------------------------------------  


 
    According to the U.S. Census the Negro population in 1900 was 8,833,994... and 87%  of the Negroes still lived in the South.   The total urban Negro population in America was 11%.  It was also around 1900 that industrialization was beginning its ascent in America.  By the end of the 1950s, the majority of America's black population was now living in Anglo-created urban centers ( in 1900 ... 56% of Negroes in the South lived in cities, in the North and West, over 96% of Negroes lived in urban centers). 


   By 1960, the American Negro population has reached almost 19 million.  NEVER in human history had a single society experienced more economic prosperity than America did during the 1950s.  

As of 1960:

--total number of cities built by Negro males : None
--total number of industries built by Negro males: None
--total number of tax bases created by Negro males capable of sustaining gov't services: None


--number of white males & females employed by a Negro and supporting a family: None (I have not found ONE case)

--number of Negroes employed by a white person (household/corporation/business) and supporting a family: Millions


-- total number of residential housing structures built by Negro males in major metropolitan centers: So minute statistically immeasurable

--total number of Negro male registered businesses: 34,400 (in other words, only .0043 of all adult black males owned their own business in 1960-  all are mom & pop operations. Source: Chronological History of the Negro -pg 523)


    When 1960 rolled around one might rightly ask:: Why has the Negro built no cities?  Why  has the Negro created no industries over the previous 95 years?  Why hasn't the Negro supplied occupations to his own male group members? ...or taken the the initiative to build urban housing?   Clearly the Negro race by 1960 has failed to provide for its people in America's urban centers.  This failing  is undoubtedly a  major  contributor to the urban Negro crime rates  represented  below. 

Note: Regarding no cities built by the Negro race, by contrast, in 1820 the American population (i.e. white people) was approx. 8.5 million , the approximate size of the Negro population in 1900,  and American males had already by then built 61 cities (2000 or more inhabitants). SOURCE
---------------------------------------------------


                                               1898


 W.E.B Du Bois: 

"In the city of Philadelphia the increasing number of bold and daring crimes committed by Negroes [since 1890] has focused the city on this subject. There is a widespread feeling that something is wrong with a race that is responsible for so much crime, and that strong remedies are called for. One has but to visit the corridors of the public buildings, when the courts are in session, to realize the part played in law-breaking by the Negro."
    Book: The Philadelphia Negro - 1898  (pg. 241)


---------------------------------------------------


1. 

 Regarding rape:  The penalty for a rape conviction in the USA from 1900 to 1970,  particularly for a black male and the victim was white, was not always death.  It was most likely a lengthly prison term.  In the state of Virginia, for example, between 1900 and 1960, out of 288 rape cases involving black males raping white females, only 50 (22%) were executed by the state (17 were lynched).

http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-67829800.html
  ---------------------------------------------------
2.      
                                             1904



Negro prison statistics for 1904...LINK


---------------------------------------------------

Comparison Of Negro And American Prisoners For Some Major US Cities For 1910
LINK  (pg, 80)

Even though only 11% of the Negro population was living in the American-built urban centers, note in the link above the great disparity in the incarceration rates of American (white) & Negro.

--------------------------------------------------
3.                  
                                               1923 to 1943



 According to the far-left leaning Sentencing Project:

 "In 1926, for example, Black Americans comprised barely 21 percent of the prison population. But in each subsequent decade, with almost clock-work precision, the percentage has increased by an average of five percent."

Is this statement accurate? Let's check...  


  I cannot find prison figures for 1926 where there is a racial breakdown ( I would like to know the source used by The Sentencing Project, as I have poured over the gov't statistical abstracts- NOTHING); however, I did find prison records for 1923.  In 1923, according to the gov't statistics above, blacks (including females) are - oops - not 21% ... but rather 31% of America's prisoners (figure includes those present in county jails). So blacks in American prisons in 1923 - during the roaring 20s economic boom! - are disproportionately represented at more than 3 times their population count. No one should doubt that in 1926 blacks were represented at approximately the same percent in the prison system. 

Note: Between 1933 and 1939 black males were imprisoned at a rate of about 24% for each successive year.  

---------------------------------------------------
4.
                                                             1941 and 1943 




Between 1941 and 1943 blacks are - AGAIN -  being imprisoned at rate of approx. 30%.  

------------------------------------------------------- 
5.

                         1950 and 1960, US prison by race



In 1950, black males are now  35% of US prison population (including local jails).

In 1960, black males are 38% of the total US prison  population (local jails included).

--------------------------------------------------

6.                                
                                                          

Time Magazine 1958: The Negro Crime Rate : A Failure In Integration

                        http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,810262-1,00.html


NYC = Black 14% of city population. Of those arrested in 1957, 44% black males; 65% black female.

Chicago = Black 15% of city population. 49% of all the predatory crimes of rape, robbery and murder are attributed to blacks.

Los Angeles (city) = Black 13% of city population.  48% of all arrests for predatory crimes of rape, robbery and murder are attributed to blacks.

Detroit = Black 25% of city population.  In the county of Detroit, 66% of the person in its jail systems are black. Of all arrests in the county, 50% are black.

Wait a minute now.  For those of you you have been reading my blogs, you know Time Magazine's title 'The Negro Crime Rate : A Failure In Integration'   is a flagrant misnomer. Integration (by force) was created on July 2, 1964 (Civil Rights Act).  So the Negro males' crime rates represented  here cannot be a failure in integration. It is rather, a failure of the black male in urban centers. 

 ---------------------------------------------------

7.  

During the 1950s,  arguably the BIGGEST economic boom in all of human history is taking place, and it's taking place in America.  Yet, America's Negroes are not just faltering they are withering is desolation and despair.  This is not, of course,  a plot conceived by the white man.  White males were, and always had been,  the major source of employment for the Negro (male and female),  and also took it  upon themselves  - because the Negro would not or could not -  to built housing for them (public housing).  White males also provided through their tax base a welfare system to feed the Negroes who were hungry.  

Remember, the black race was suppose to be separate and self-reliant as a people i.e. they were SUPPOSE to build their own towns, cities, industries, tax base, create their own political titles, or, if they truly felt oppressed, colonize a place in America e.g. like the Mormons did.  One distinct people living separate from another distinct people was the established norm throughout human history.  

 
Journalist Theodore H. White describes life in Chicago for the Negro in 1956 as follows:

“… Fifteen to 25 per cent [Negroes] unemployed here; one quarter of [Negro] families in some [census] tracts without fathers; of 17,000 Negro births in Chicago, an estimated 4,000 illegitimate.”

“… of all the women in Chicago's county jail, 69 per cent are Negro; of all the men, 62 per cent; of all the forlorn on relief, 72 per cent Negro; of all the clients of public housing in Chicago, seeking shelter of the government, 70 per cent Negro. And in Detroit, Philadelphia, New York, kindred figures grimly repeat themselves.”
 
 http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/6331/
 ---------------------------------------------------
8.
                                                                                 1958


The page below is a copy taken directly from the Government Statistical Abstracts and is the earliest crime statistics I could find produced by the federal gov't which breaks down crime by race.

In 1958 Negroes were about 11% of the total US population.   We are shown here for the first time what white people in the 1950s very likely already suspected regarding Negro violent crime.  

Year 1958

Rape:: 46% Black
Robbery:: 54% Black
Murder:: 61% Black
------------------------------------------------

9.                

                                                                          1960


Was the Negro violent crime statistics just an anomaly for the year 1958? Below are 1960 stats.

 Note: Murder non-negligence implied intentional murder. Negligent homicide is a reduced charge, implying non-intent to murder the victim.

Year 1960

Rapes:: 52%  Black
Robbery:: 56% Black
Murder:: 56%  Black


Here's something that you should find interesting.  In this following table, note the substantial drop in predatory crimes (rapes, robbery, murder) when black males live in a rural environment.

* Again, black males are 10% of the US male population.

Year 1960 (rural predatory crimes)

Rapes:: 19%  Black
Robbery:: 23% Black
Murder:: 37%  Black
-------------------------------------------------

10.      

                                                     1963


Between 1930 and 1963, of the 3833 executions carried out by states and the federal gov't :
--54%  were black.
--90% of all executions for Rape were black.   


 ---------------------------------------------------
11. 

The above statistics, as everyone can plainly see, show a very clear propensity on the part of the Negro male (between 1900 and 1960) to commit violent crimes, and particularly within urban centers. However, before we continue here, let's keep this in mind:: 
  • the percentage of black males between 16 and 35 in the prison system was within the acceptable range for cooperation from a male group.1
Let's do the math.   First, let's take a look at the percentage of black & white males represented in the state and federal prison system in 1960 between the ages 16 to 35.  This age group (16 to 35) within any societal structure would have to cooperate to produce political  & economic stability ( at least that seems reasonable to me as these are the prime years ).  In 1960, the census reported the black population at approx. 18 million. That would mean that approx. 9 million black males lived in the US.  Of that 9 million about 40% would be between the age of 16 and 35 years-old.[1]     So, 40% of 9 million=3.6 million black males between 16 and 35.  Of that 3.6 million in 1960 ...  87,400  black males are in the US prisons (state and federal)That means that approx.  2.4 %  of black males in this age group (16 - 35) are incarcerated within federal & state prisons in the US. 2 

 For white males between 16 and 35, there were approx. 80 million white males total, and, using the same percentages above, 40% of 80 million = 32 million white male between 16 and 35. There were 162,000 white males in the state and federal prison in 1960. So, 162 (k) /32 (m)=.005.  In other words, only one half of one percent - .05% - of white males in our stated age group are incarcerated in state and federal prisons in 1960.   


Note: A "male group" are males racially, linguistically and religiously similar.

1.  While there is no generally accepted percentage for a male group to cooperate to maintain stability within a society, we can, however, look at the Continental Army during the American Revolution and at least get a rudimentary approximation as to what percentage of a male group who chose to no longer cooperate with the status quo, can result in the collapse of the political system (in our case, the British colonial system).  The American population in 1780 was approx. 2.7 million.  Half of that number would be males.  Using our 40% figure for males between 16 and 35, the age group that would comprise virtually the entire fighting force for the Continental Army, that would mean that there would be approx. 450,000 American males available to Washington to fight the British.  However, only about 20,000 of that number ever fought with Washington.  In other words, it took only about 4% of the males between 15 and 35 to bring down the whole British colonial system.  Again, blacks in 1960, their prison rate – non-cooperation rate - for the age group 16 to 35, is approx. 2.4%. White males, it’s at .005 approx. Ergo, for both male groups (white & black), both are in the acceptable cooperation range.

Note:  Negro males did not fight in the Continental Army


2.  I am factoring in the mean life expectancy for black & white male's between 1900 and 1960.  For blacks, it was about 55 years.  For whites, about 64 years.




-----------------------------------------------------------------------


PART II
-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Black Male Crime Statistics
Under  'New' Compulsory Inclusionism
System (1964 to present)

                                        --------------------------------------------------

Why did American Negroes march down America's streets and demand integration rights into political and economic systems of a people (White Christians) they were also labeling as their brutal oppressor? Why didn't the Black race demand separation and autonomy?  All of human history suggests a people who claim they are brutally treated and oppressed by another...that's what they should do. But American Negroes didn't do that. They never did it. WHY?  ANSWER to all the above>> Blacks wanted and received the biggest magnanimous gesture by one people toward another in human history:  the Black PRIVILEGE --AKA Civil Rights Laws.


The Black PRIVILEGE is embodied in America's civil rights laws ( passed into law by White Christian males). These laws  basically allows the Black race to  BULLY around the White race. Here are some PRIVILEGES bestowed on the Black race because the federal  '64, '65 & '68 Civil Rights Acts.

What the Black Race Gets:

  • claim instant access to all economic environments (occupational titles created by White males), and with no QUID PRO QUO  
  • Claim instant access to all political environments created by White males , and with no QUID PRO QUO  
  • Claim instant access to all residential communities created White males, and with no QUID PRO QUO

(note: regarding quid pro quo...from 1865 to 1964 there were NO economic systems [industries or tax bases] created by Negroes; nor were there any political systems established, nor were there any urban residential communities built by Negroes)


  •  pull the proverbial "race card" whenever they feel their Black PRIVILEGE is being threatened.  Pulling the race card means making White people SUBMIT to the Black person. They achieves submission by knowing White people are psychologically conditioned to submit instantly to certain conditioned- response words: racism, plantation, lynching, segregation, Jim Crow...and they expect ALL White people to bow their heads, shuffle their feet and SUBMIT. 
  • receive affirmative action programs (launched in 1965, now includes federal, state & local contract set-asides,  hiring quotas, college admission double standards) 
  • community development banks (to give loans to black start-up businesses - who have little or no start-up capital) 
  • Small Business Administration (federal agency that gives Blacks favorable treatment, which includes loans for start-up businesses where little or no capital is needed


  • Title VII  race-based shakedown lawsuits against White people's businesses and the White tax base 

That ONE people would be allowed to take so much from another people...

All of the above Black PRIVILEGES have been going on now for almost 50 years (1965 to 2014).  

When the Black race was given their  - unprecedented in human history -  PRIVILEGES through the civil rights laws (including affirmative action programs), no one should question White Christian males believed that by cooperating with these laws, they were doing something altruistic. That White males, by not rebelling over the forced integration of their status environments, would allow Blacks race the necessary income / resources to build their own communities, their own businesses, their way of life...and finally achieve for the first time in their Negro history in America...  a sense of self-reliance and empowerment as a people.

So, 50 years now with all the above Black PRIVILEGES...how has the Black race used these extraordinary PRIVILEGES to further empowerment and self-reliance for their people?


       AFRICAN-AMERICANS  CONTRIBUTION TO THE US TAX BASE


Regarding Black businesses in the USA (2007)... Blacks are about 13% of the US population (2007), therefore, one would expect they produce at least 13% of the jobs in America. Unfortunately, they're not even close. In fact, if we measured the Black-owned businesses' and their collective contribution to the US tax base as a patient hooked up to an EKG machine ... it would register as DEAD.



Here are the numbers. There are 1.9 million registered Black-owned businesses (2007). However, only about 5% have employees (yes, you're reading right), or about 106,000 Black-owned firms, employing 921,032 people (I have not found data on how many White people work for Black companies). The irrelevance of Black businesses to the US economy is represented in the following statistic:  total number of US employees (nonfarm) is over 130 million in 2012.  In other words, Black businesses employ less than  .072  of the total number of people employed in America. Of those Black-owned businesses that are going concerns with 15 or more employees (the amount of employees necessary to be protected under the 1964 Civil Rights Title VII), only about 25% of those businesses (about 27,000) meet the criterion. And only about 20 black-owned companies in America employ 1000 or more.  Of further note is that there is no way to find out how many of these Black-owned companies were set up with financial help by White males who wanted to qualify for the BLACK PRIVILEGE i.e. go into business with a Black person to qualify for federal, state, county, city mandated affirmative action programs known as "contract set-asides" just for Blacks. So who is employing virtually ALL employed Blacks in America?  Either White-owned businesses or the White tax base (gov't jobs).
SOURCE::


The failure of the Black race to produce businesses across America and employ people - like the white community - leaves Black communities, particularly within urban centers, without legitimate economic opportunities. The lack of economic opportunities means idol Black males, which leads to criminal behavior. 



12.

Total Homicides attributable to black males between 1965 to 2011...

 =451,295

  How the 451,295 was computed::  There were 843,543 homicides in the US between 1965 & 2011.  Blacks, on average,  have been arrested in the category for murder in every consecutive year from 1965 to 2011 at between 50% to  60%. I decided to use a mean ave. of 54.3% for black homicides from 1965 to 2011.  
So, 843,543 x .535 = 451, 295 


Breakdown of total US murders by decade:
1965 to 1970 US murders= 77, 800
1971 to 1980 US murders= 199,270 


1981 to 1995 US murders= 303, 769  
 

1995 to 2011 US murders= 262, 734 






SOURCE


---------------------------------------------------


13.







TABLE #230:   Year 1969


Rape:: 50% Black
Robbery:: 66% Black
Murder:: 65% Black


-----------------------------------------------------------

Table #312:     Year 1978

Rape:: 49% Black
Robbery:: 59% Black
Murder:: 59% Black


Blacks in 1978 were approximately 11% of America's population

----------------------------------------------------------
14.                                                            1986



"According to the FBI�s Uniform Crime Report, in 1986 Blacks accounted for 46.5% of all arrests for violent crimes even though Blacks comprised 12%  of the US population.   Blacks accounted for 48% of the persons arrested for murder; 46.6% of all arrests for rape; 39.8% for assault . . . In 1986, of those person under 18 years of age, Blacks accounted for 54% of those arrested for violent crimes . . . the highest violent crime rates are demonstrated by young Black males. . . . Over 40% of all jail inmates throughout the nation are Black�and the percentage is rapidly rising.14 More young Black men died from homicide in one year (1977) than died in ten years in the Vietnam War "  SOURCE


---------------------------------------------------------
15.                                       2005


EXPLOSION OF BLACK CRIME AGAINST WHITE PEOPLE 


In 2005, there were more than 645,000 victims of inter-racial violent crimes in the U.S.  In 90 percent of those crimes, black offenders attacked white people i.e. more than 580,000 white victims.

SOURCE

-----------------------------------------------
16.                                                     2013




2013  article by Pat Buchanan on race relations and black racism & crime:  

"In New York from January to June 2008, 83 percent of all gun assailants were black, according to witnesses and victims, though blacks were only 24 percent of the population. Blacks and Hispanics together accounted for 98 percent of all gun assailants.  Forty-nine of every 50 muggings and murders in the Big Apple were the work of black or Hispanic criminals."

Also, on RAPE from same article:

After researching the FBI numbers for "Suicide of a Superpower," this writer concluded: "An analysis of 'single offender victimization figures' from the FBI for 2007 finds blacks committed 433,934 crimes against whites, eight times the 55,685 whites committed against blacks. Interracial rape is almost exclusively black on white — with 14,000 assaults on white women by African Americans in 2007. Not one case of a white sexual assault on a black female was found in the FBI study."

SOURCE

----------------------------------------------



 Continuing to build this site...


32 comments:

  1. "I have given my life to alleviate the sufferings of Africa. There is something that all White men who have lived here like I have must learn and know: that these individuals are a sub-race. They have neither the mental or emotional abilities to equate or share equally with White men in any functions of our civilization. I have given my life to try to bring unto them the advantages which our civilization must offer, but I have become well aware that we must retain this status: White the superior, and they the inferior. For whenever a White man seeks to live among them as their equals, they will destroy and devour him, and they will destroy all his work. And so for any existing relationship or any benefit to this people, let White men, from anywhere in the world, who would come to help Africa, remember that you must maintain this status: you the master and they the inferior, like children whom you would help or teach. Never fraternize with them as equals. Never accept them as your social equals or they will devour you. They will destroy you." -Dr. Albert Schweitzer

    ReplyDelete
  2. Most of the crimes from 1926 and 1960's is false. White men where prejudice of African Americans they where accused of many crimes they did not commit, these things still go on today. African Americans hated the white people for what they did. Which explains most of the crime. White people turned African Americans into monsters. There was no peace, no sanity. White men are evil. Don't try to be our friends now. We hate you! What you've done to the African American people was worse than any crime an African American man or woman can ever do. And you think your the good people. You white people started this war, and now you think you can sit back and act like your good people trying to be civil. The white men had a head start in developement African Americans did not. We are behind because you put us there. But guess what we are moving up. Try enslaving us again! Ha, I dare you!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Try enslaving us again" The people who enslaved you back then are still doing the same today, them people are other Africans. In Africa the slave trade is still alive and well so if you are looking for someone to blame look no further than your homeland. It always makes me laugh to see Africans doing the self pitty thing and complaining about slavery, It seems you dont have the ability to feel embarrassment.

      Delete
    2. If it weren't for Whitey you'd still be stone age savages. As for enslaving you again theres nothing you can do for us any longer. Eli Whitney made you obsolete.

      Delete
    3. If you dont like whitey go back to africa.You constantly embarras this country just google the statistics and be very sad of your own people.

      Delete
  3. . "African Americans hated the white people for what they did. Which explains most of the crime."

    Anony, I don't get it? Why then did the black man plead for integration ... into the very male group that's doing him ALL those wrongs you claim? In fact, not only is the black man pleading (then demanding in the 60s) for his integration, but he's also insisting that the white males are the source for his dignity, his freedom and even his very manhood. No other people in human history EVER did such a thing. The white man recorded this incredible event - the black man's plea then the DEMAND for integration - for all posterity to bear witness to. And yet you claim the white man was the black man's brutal and EVIL oppressor? Your argument makes no sense dude. No people DEMAND to be integrated INTO all that brutality and evil oppression! think about it...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A most salient if not absorbing point of social commentary. At 75, I'm still trying to digest the madness of the black race in this country. Refusing to apologize, as do the White Paternalistic Progressives, my focus and mindset is firmly on the middle course. On the one hand, blackie has been with us now for almost 400 years, counting backward to the Jamestown days, yet our African-American brothers have yet to establish a meaningful friendship across the great color divide. Neither side trusts the other, to any meaningful extent. White America has done its level best, going so far as inviting a semi-black to sit in the highest office in this land. Still, on every occasion, Mr. Obama has shown himself to be the "grand apologist" for his race, every time a black/white conflict arises. When does it stop, my God.

      Delete
    2. without the millions upon millions brain damaged white support...you think all these will happen? No wonder US is falling so quickly nowadays to the rest of the world. It lose its spirit long time ago.

      Delete
  4. Anywhere that blacks are present, crime is committed. Look at Africa, where some of the most vicious acts of cruelty are carried out. Look at the crime rates of England since blacks started immigrating. Haiti is yet another prime example of violence and the inability to self govern and create a civil functioning society. The U.S. invested a lot of money and time modernizing the country. Everything was going well until the Haitians were left alone to fend for themselves. Meanwhile, the Dominican Republic is doing just fine. Also, if you're going to say how much you hate white people, then you cannot whine about racism. You should not have any special laws nor given jobs, housing, etc., based on your skin color. That will even the playing field. If you really want to hate someone for slavery, why not hate the fellow Africans that sold you to begin with? At this moment in time, would you prefer your family live in Africa or here? I can't imagine that you would have a better life still living in huts surrounded by corruption and lawlessness. Nothing annoys me more than the pathetic attempt to STILL blame the whites for your present situation. Your culture promotes and accepts violence and ignorance. Any black that tries to better themselves by going to school or speaking the English language as it should be is ridiculed. If you want someone to blame for your present situation just look in the mirror. The worst thing this country ever did was to coddle you and try to right a wrong.

    Blacks still lead the nation in crime and times have changed enough that there's no way that every black is "set up" by the police. Admit it, blacks just have a propensity for violence.

    ReplyDelete
  5. all of ya'll suck

    ReplyDelete
  6. Blacks have declared war on Whites. It is time Whites got concealed carry permits and started carrying handguns for self-defense. When attacked by a negro who intends to do you bodily harm, shoot him/her to death. Send the message to the negro population that such attacks will usually end in the death of the negro. Let them riot if they wish. Stock up on ammo and guns. Use them when attacked or your family is put in danger by negros.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Racial bias
      Among the single-bias hate crime incidents in 2010, there were 3,949 victims of racially motivated hate crime. A closer examination of these victim data showed that:

      70.0 percent were victims of an offender’s anti-black bias.
      17.7 percent were victims of an anti-white bias.
      5.1 percent were victims of an anti-Asian/Pacific Islander bias.
      1.2 percent were victims of an anti-American Indian/Alaskan Native bias.
      6.0 percent were victims of a bias against a group of individuals in which more than one race was represented (anti-multiple races, group).
      (Based on Table 1.)


      By race
      In 2010, the races of the 6,008 known hate crime offenders were as follows:

      58.6 percent were white.
      18.4 percent were black.
      8.9 percent were groups made up of individuals of various races (multiple races, group).
      1.1 percent were Asian/Pacific Islander.
      1.0 percent were American Indian/Alaskan Native.
      12.0 percent were of unknown race.

      hmm...

      Delete
    2. Jimmy L. Shirley Jr.October 6, 2012 at 9:19 PM

      That is because the law enforcement is almost always loathe to ever charge Negroes with any sort of hate crime. And whereas Whites can be so charged at the slightest little hint of anti-Black, even to simply speaking, that would never happen to Negroes. They can call us names all over the place, but if we do the same, we are charged. Thus, while the very concept of hate crime is so unAmerican as it violates our 1st Amendment rights to free speech, the statistics are skewed because the law is unevenly applied.

      Delete
    3. SHOW ME A STATISTIC AND I'LL SHOW YOU A LIE IN THE MAKING.

      Delete
  7. i live in new york city and work for a company that is 80% black. When i read this stuff i really wonder what are the life experiences of the authors? do any of you really know anyone outside of your own race? i don't even think about the fact that i look different than most of my fellow workers. sure there are times when race related issues have come up and i might disagree with a coworker but its not something that they or i tend to elevate. All i can say here is some of the views expressed do not in most respects conform to my experiences with blacks or other ethnicities i've encountered in more than 10 years of living here. I'm not argung with these posted stats or crime stats. i see the gang bangers out there everday and their the ones doing most of the crime against rival gangs, etc. for the most part if your not involved with them they do not conern themselves with you but most people that i talk to in the black communtiy are not stupid layabouts on welfare and they do not condone or support what is happening in their community when it comes to crime violent or opportunistic. there are severe problems in this city and i don't entirely buy into the liberal notion that it has to do with poverty. my own parents having lived through the depression were by far poorer than the average minority today but their values were different and they were not subjected to the racial injustice that blacks have experienced. This all gets complicated but it would be interesting to see and compare what poor white people are going through and how their responding. And i am in no way apologizing for or condoning the violence in some of these neighborhoods but i can say with certainty that i have not found blacks that i have conversed with as having a different set of values where these issues are concerned.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Check the stats and realize whats really going on.

      Delete
    2. @ anonymous: "and they were not subjected to the racial injustice that blacks have experienced"

      This is a myth sir. I know it because I've done an extensive amount of research on the black race. I intend to combat this statement - a lie - every time I see it.

      Prior to forced integration (1964) blacks were NOT an oppressed people, nor were they being wronged in any way by white people. Blacks plead for then demanded integration - from the very people they were also calling their brutal oppressor. There was no constitutional right for blacks to received forced integration; nor was there any precedent to it in human history (i.e. one people demanding integration rights into the political and economic environments of another people). Blacks, prior to 1964, were suppose to be a separate and self-reliant people. They chose integration on their own volition.

      There are many things desperately wrong about this - first of a kind in human history - forced integration system that white males created in 1964. I do believe, based on all the evidence I've researched and witnessed over the last 48 years, blacks and white would be MUCH better off if blacks lived separate from whites; and blacks were required to provide for themselves within the structure of their own group. I would even support a homeland.

      African Americans are the only people in human history never to have achieved self-reliance as a people. It's TIME they are masters of their own destiny!

      Delete
    3. Try, in the pleasant course of daily conversation, oppose a black man's point of view on the subject of race and see how quickly you are figuratively slapped in the face. [if not indeed, literally]

      Delete
    4. "Prior to 1964 blacks were not an oppressed people."

      You are kidding right? I mean...seriously...are you smoking crack? Um...hundreds of years of slavery is not oppression? Being forced to use different bathrooms, schools, water fountains...not oppression?

      Please don't pass around whatever you are smoking because it clearly makes you delusional.

      Delete
  8. http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm

    http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_04/persons_arrested/table_38-43.html

    http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/past_years.html

    ReplyDelete
  9. Here's some interesting statistics on murder in the years of Chicago for the years 1870-1930. Out of the 11018 murders commited during this period, whites commited 7176 (65% ) and blacks commited 1244 (11%). Regarding interracial murder stats, most involved white offenders and black victims. Whites commited 835 murders against blacks while blacks only commited 274 murders against whites.

    http://homicide.northwestern.edu/database/

    This was a similar thing in Memphis apparently, even when blacks commited the majoirty of homicides.

    http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=y6GVMpoqYPIC&pg=PA206&lpg=PA206&dq=memphis+homicide+1920+negro&source=bl&ots=_phg7gF1zt&sig=6JhPJ26LMSVuLWf1T-3VeiAPJuA&hl=en&sa=X&ei=8hLQUuDrOInv0gWF4IGABw&ved=0CC0Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=memphis%20homicide%201920%20negro&f=false

    "There were were 411 homicides in Memphis in 1920-5, and information as to the race of both murderer and victim was available for 379 cases. Victims comprised 51 whites and 360 negroes. In 3 percent of the sample Negroes had killed whites and in 13.1 percent, whites had killed Negroes."

    If you're looking to add to data on interracial crimes prior to 1964, these may come in useful, even if the majority of interracial crime during this period was white-on-black ,in Chicago and Memphis at least, even though henious black-on-white crimes usually resulted in lynchings or executions.

    Althought I understand the message you're trying to put together with this blog, some of your statements can be misleading. FBI and BOJ statistics show most violent crime to be intraracial, with whites victimising whites and blacks victimising blacks. This holds true for most types of crimes (excluding robbery) and age groups. Still though, interracial violence should be condemned whoever it's against.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As I opinioned on #11 ... I think black male crime in 1960, based on gov't statistics, though 5 TIMES higher than white males, was well within a tolerable range. Then came the DEMS forced integration...

      As for the crime samples you cited ... I think it's a bit misleading. For blacks, my research has shown they would commit rapes, robberies and murder against white people - rapes being the biggest problem. White people back then typically would retaliate. Blacks crossing the color line likely also resulted in violence by whites - i.e. white males protected their neighborhoods! There may have been a few rapes, robberies or murders by whites against blacks in any given year for the time periods you stated. Point is, I don't believe prior to the 1960s whites feared blacks in the slightest, or that blacks feared white people. Today, fear of the black male is omnipresent. Best to give the black race a homeland in America and FINALLY be done with problem.

      .

      Delete
    2. I don't think those 835 murders against blacks were commited as an act of "protection". This era during Chicago was particuarly violent, there could be several explainations to wh the white-on-black murder rate was higher during this time.

      While I can definitely understand your concern about black-on-white crime, I've always thought that white-on-white crime is epidemic in comparison, based on the data I've looked up from various DOJ and FBI statistics. Like sexual homicides/rape-slayings for example, one DOJ report mentioned that 55% were white-on-white while 15% were black-on-white out of the over 3,000 indentified over a 30-year period. However, some crime statistics on "white offenders" may not be 100% accurate as it includes Hispanics as well. And although most whites are murdered by other whites, they'll more likely be murdered by a black if the offender isn't an acquaintance of any kind (about 30% to 40%).

      According to various NIBRS reports as well, black violent offenders will more likely offend against other blacks than whites, though they are more likely to offend interracially than whites are. I could provide links to the sources that mention these if you're interested, though they can be easy to find.

      I completely respect your views and am not going to ignorantly slander you as "racist" based on what your blog is about. I just felt that some of your statements were a bit exagerrated at times and made out like whites were primarly victims of black violent crime whereas they get victimised by other whites more often, same with black victims. Like I said though, there needs to be harsher condemning of interracial crime, even if it's primarly against whites.

      Delete
  10. Oh I thought I was on a site that had solutions not insults. I was looking to try and help solve the problem not be apologetic or explanatory. Yes I am black, educated, and do not commit crimes. I work hard, as do many blacks in this country, and am honest. There are black criminals but there are also many black success stories. We can say that blacks have ruined everything in this country, but a simple amount of research will show you corporate greed and selling the country to China and India has done that. Furthermore, number of people African Americans have enslaved: none ; number of people African Americans have put in ovens because they were Jewish: none ; number of people African Americans have put in internment camps, reservations, or segregated legally because of their race; none. We can play the blame game all day long, and as you can see both sides have their equal share of blame. Yes whites have created an explosion of technological advances and industry. But where has that got us? More separate than ever, more suicidal than ever, more unhappy than ever. Ironically if it weren't for blacks lower class and middle class whites would be the target of discrimination. Just ask the European Immigrants and the Irish. They faced so much discrimination they had to change their names and pretend they were white. Blacks, Indians and Asians didn't have that luxury. And even if we do succeed to your liking, such as the Japanese, you still don't like us. We're considered "sneaky" or "job stealers." So, what exactly do we do to solve the problem? We can argue statistics all day but black people aren't going back to Africa and you can spend what few years you have using your extraordinary intelligence solving the problem or putting your head together with other intelligent people to come to a solution. Or play the blame game as you're accusing blacks of doing. Sounds like you've inhabited the very qualities you loathe in blacks. Blaming them for all the injustices in the world.

    ReplyDelete
  11. And another honest statement would be this: Do you really think that if blacks were removed from this planet the problems of the world would vanish and that you would be tapping glasses with the likes of Bill Gates and Donald Trump talking about the loathsome negro and how horrible it was with them here. News flash, you would be the new Negro. We are the only thing stopping you from being us. So a little gratitude please to the black man who is sparing you and your family from the discrimination you would face without us. How do I know this? Do you think upper class, wealthy, well to do people come to low brow websites to argue with people who have non solution oriented answers to problems? People who are successful are solution oriented and create not complain, period. I'm a solution oriented person which s why I stumbled upon this site. I was trying to find people who have ideas to solve the ongoing crisis in our communities. If we are the sub species, then a solution should be very quick for you to come up with. Since putting blacks on boats or separating them is an unintelligent and unrealistic solution I'm dying to hear what you're breadth of knowledge has led you to come up with. Please tell.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "I thought I was on a site that had solutions not insults."

      And just where hv I insulted? I gave facts -- just a messenger. Also, If you drop down to #11 ... you can see that I hv opinioned the political/economic system America had BEFORE forced integration, that system - of maintaining the color line - did not produce a level of crime (white or black) to threaten the political stability of the system. After forced integration (compulsory inclusionism), this is where , and inexplicably, black violence, and particularly against white people, has exploded -- to intolerable levels. Clearly blacks hv used the new civil rights laws to commit predatory crimes against white people. I've documented these crimes here.

      http://theinjusticefile.blogspot.com/2011/04/main-menu-page-white-black-inter-racial.html

      Blacks were NOT owed integration rights into the status environments of another people! No precedent to this in human history. White people had their living arrangements, blacks had theirs. If blacks felt their living arrangements were inferior to white people, this was the fault of the black man, not the white man. Maintaining a color line was prior to 1964 ... completely consistent with the social mores of the times, as well as the existing laws i.e. white people DID NOT wrong the black man by maintaining a color line! Blacks marched for integration rights … and white males gave them those rights. No people in human history EVER gv such rights to another people. Think about that.

      Finally, the Irish and other Europeans , and Jews and blacks DID NOT "suffer" from discrimination in American history prior to 1964. This is part of the liberal’s re-write of American history. From 1790 to 1964 … America was divided into male groups, and each male group practiced Historical Group Recognition (HGR). HGR is a completely normal human condition. HGR is also the sole reason for the existence of all the racial and ethnic group on the planet earth. The 1964 compulsory integration law (Civil Rights Act) changed all that. BTW, I believe after MUCH research America must return to HGR.

      "So, what exactly do we do to solve the problem?"

      I'll address this question under your next comment. And despite what you think, I have given the racial problem a great deal of thought. I also do not hv anything against the black race. They are in a political//economic system they did not create.

      Delete
  12. Once again, this is not a viable option. This option derives from a Lincoln quote? This may have been an option in 1865 but not in 2014? This would tear apart homes, destroy marriages and families, ruin friendships, make this country the laughing stock of the planet, set us back to 1865. Who would foot the bill? Taxpayers? How would it work logistically? If you live in Montana and that's the chosen state, would you give up your business, land, livestock, generations of family so the government could appease some newly enforced segregation? It would be a legal nightmare not to mention a moral travesty. Think things through before you come up with a silly non workable idea such as this one. Even Malcolm X the most outspoken proponent for separation realized how ludicrous it was in the end. As a black man I realize there are problems in our community with drugs and violence but so do many other blacks and whites. It undermines the work may have done to try and curb the violence and drugs by saying the work is fruitless and lets just put everyone on a ship or put them in their own state. It's ridiculous, silly, and not even considerable. And, once again, it wouldn't solve the problems within the white community it would likely increase them. There would still be meth houses, school shootings, Newtown being absolutely horrendous, sexual abuse, pornography, rape, killing, discrimination, illiteracy and poverty. Many of the problems of the black community are poverty based. And poverty is a difficult cycle to break. Just ask white people who live in trailer parks and the Appalachians to cite a few examples. If just being white was the solution we could simply send social workers to their house and say "just be white," and that would make them happy. Problems stem from various places but to say that an entire race needs to be shipped away and penalized from the crimes of some is preposterous. I work at a juvenile facility with whites and blacks and believe me white kids have issues too. The black kids are tough and mean but many of them, once you build a rapport are easier to communicate than the troubled white kids when they're mad. I'm sorry if black people have hurt you at some point in your life but whites have hurt me as well and I don't hold grudges, think they need to be separated, or have hidden animosity against them. A more realistic approach would be to recognize that there are problems in our communities and put our heads together to solve them, not spend precious time with black and white supremacist views for solutions. But, thus, indeed to focus my energy on real world solutions so that is where I will use the remainder of my energy. Good luck on organizing a group to send blacks back to Africa or get them their own state. I'm sure that should happen sometime soon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Once again, this is not a viable option"

      The option [a black homeland] IMO… is in fact very viable. First, a place for the homeland. Easy for me to decide. It's S. Carolina -- more than half black. Second, how to get the black race there in a humane way? Remember, blacks in America (non-immigrants) are the ONLY people in human history never to have achieved a state of self-reliance. Blacks must be informed of this reality … and why a homeland for them is necessary (e.g. collapse of the black family unit, explosion of black males in the prison system, explosion of black-on-white crime etc). A homeland would give the black race an opportunity to develop their own distinct culture, way of life, a feeling of empowerment over their own lives and a feeling of self-worth as a racial group. I’ve tried to explain why blacks marched for integration -- demanding white males stop practicing HGR -- with the LINK BELOW:

      http://theinjusticefile.blogspot.com/2011/04/american-negroes-their-own-country-why.html


      Bottom line:: Black males MUST create their own status environments. This is a construct of human nature. Black males have been using the status environments of another people (white Christian males). Black males being a non-Occupational Ranking male group will forever guarantee them misery in white males’ Occupational Ranking system. This is, always has been, the BIG problem for the black race.

      So how to humanely get the black race to its homeland? The first thing to do would be to eliminate the three federal compulsory integration laws (1964, 1965 and 1968 Civil Rights Acts). Next, eliminate most of the DEMs socialist goodies - that blacks hv fell in love with and grown dependent on. Human nature being what it is, blacks would be systematically eliminated form jobs in the white communities and white-owned businesses. In the black homeland ...this is where the federal gov’t could lure most blacks(all?) over time by offering US gov’t produced jobs and the welfare programs. White people would have to be taught (an absolute necessity!!) NOT TO PITY BLACKS. The mainstream media would also hv to cooperate and NOT allow blacks (and white liberals) to use them to manipulate white people's sensitivities and imply to white people that they hv a moral obligation (HINT, as a superior people) to provide for the black race. Instead, the mainstream media would be used to promote the positive aspects of the black homeland. If this program is followed, I believe the overwhelming - 90% or more - of blacks in about 10 years would gravitate to their homeland.

      Finally, no black person that I can remember has ever done me any wrong. I have nothing against the race. I am not driven by emotion in any of my many blogs on the black race. I have a political viewpoint and I am supporting my viewpoint with facts. The present compulsory integration system, a first-of-a-kind system in human history & more than 50 years old now, does NOT work. Time to end it.

      Delete
  13. Something must be done to help the inner city Negro change it's culture of immorality, purposeful ignorance, and violent crime. This will never happen under the present administration and it's blatant of buying votes by promising the Negro more welfare and no work. The Negro must be taken off welfare, forced to work in factories near it's home where the government can provide day care for it's mostly illegitimate spawn so it can be forced to get an education, use birth control, and above all, work to pay it's way.
    "Repatriation" [If you get my drift] would be the best solution. I rest my case.

    ReplyDelete
  14. The author of this blog is a racist who is incapable of seeing past his own hatred and discomfort with black people. He says nothing about the hundreds of years of slavery, followed by segregation, failed government welfare programs, the war on drugs, red lining, and racism. All of these things I just listed are key factors for the high poverty rate in the black urban communities. Nothing this author says should be taken seriously. I do hope the author at least has the decency to keep my comment on the site so that others can read my truth. I am white, for the record.

    ReplyDelete
  15. "The author of this blog is a racist"
    By calling me a" racist", I am suppose to SUBMIT to you. RIGHT? Not going to happen.

    Judging by the content of your post, I would guess you're a teenager. Since I think you are a teenager, and have clearly been brainwashed by the Dept. of Education, I will indulge you with a little bit of time here and answer some of your charges.

    "He says nothing about hundreds of years of slavery,"
    Wasn't hundreds of years of slavery. In 1700 there were only about 25,000 salves in America. In 1776, there were appx 400,000. The cotton gin (1795) encouraged a boom in slave trading. Blacks in Africa EAGERLY & GLEEFULLY rounded up fellow Blacks and sold them to White slave traders. The US ended the slave trade in 1808.
    BOTTOM LINE: If it weren't for slavery, there would no Blacks in America. In other words, virtually all blacks alive in America today...WOULD CEASE TO EXIST! You want THAT, dude? Blacks in America should celebrate the stupidity of the white slave trade.

    "segregation, failed government welfare programs, the war on drugs, red lining, and racism."
    I've been around the blacks-ALWAYS-been-victim- in-America-and-NOTHING--poor -ole blacks -can-do-about-it argument for quite some time. This is right out of their play book. Complete NONSENSE.

    Blacks were a completely FREE people after 1865. Can't simultaneously be a FREE people yet also an oppressed people.

    Regarding discrimination, Ive answered that here:
    http://americans4justice.wordpress.com/2014/03/26/did-white-people-discriminate-against-blacks-answer-no/

    WHY BLACKS HAVE FAILED IN AMERICA: Industrialized countries require occupational rankling to produce jobs & a tax base. Blacks from 1900 (beginning of Industrialization) to 1964, created no occupational ranking environments. They are a non-occupational ranking racial group. Ergo, they need white males to produce this environment for them. Because of forced integration, White males hv been forced to be the providers - indefinitely - for the black race. Can't be done. White males need to end this forced integration system. Blacks need a homeland.

    ReplyDelete