Thursday, August 11, 2011

Prison and Crime Records by Race (Black and White) Between 1904 and 1960


The above table is for the year 1904.   Blacks in this year are approximately 10% of the total US population.

 1904 = Blacks represent 32% of US prison population
                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                                           -----------------------------------------------------


 1923 prison breakdown by race...



In 1923, according to the gov't statistics above, blacks (including females) are 31% of America's prisoners (figure includes those present in county jails).  Blacks are slightly less than 10% of US total population.


                                          ----------------------------------------------------
                                          -----------------------------------------------------

The tables below are for the years 1933 and 1934 and represents prisoners received from the courts for incarceration in state and federal institutions.




During the 1930s blacks were imprisoned at their lowest level - about 25% of the total people being sentenced. In other words, during the decade of the Great Depression,  poverty did NOT automatically produce crime.
                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                                           -----------------------------------------------------

                                        The above figures apparently do not include local jails.

In 1942, blacks would likely represent about 33% of the total US prisoners (not including local jails).  That would put the total number of imprisoned blacks in 1942 at about 50,000.


                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                                           -------------------------------------------------------

1950 and 1960, US prison by race




In 1950, black males are now  35% of US prison population (including local jails)

In 1960, black males are 38% of the total US prison population (local jails included). Calculating just federal and state inmate numbers, that would put the total number of blacks incarcerated  at about 87,000 - up from 50,000 in 1942.
                                       
 

                                                -----------------------------------------------------
                                                -----------------------------------------------------
What black males are being arrested for (1958):


  We are shown here for the first time what white people - in the 1950s - very likely already suspected regarding Negro violent crime. Black males are 10% of the US male population in 1958.

Arrests for the year 1958:

Rape:: 46% Black
Robbery:: 54% Black
Murder:: 61% Black
-----------------------------------------------------


1960


Was the Negro violent crime statistics just an anomaly for the year 1958? Below are 1960 stats.

 Note: Murder non-negligence implied intentional murder. Negligent homicide is a reduced charge, implying non-intent to murder the victim.

Year 1960

Rapes:: 52%  Black
Robbery:: 56% Black
Murder:: 56%  Black
------------------------------------------------

Here's something that you should find interesting.  In this following table, note the substantial drop in predatory crimes (rapes, robbery, murder) when black males live in a rural environment.

* Again, black males are 10% of the US male population.

Year 1960 (rural predatory crimes)

Rapes:: 19%  Black
Robbery:: 23% Black
Murder:: 37%  Black
------------------------------------------------

                                                                 --------------------------



----------------------------------------------





SOURCE


---------------------------------------------------






TABLE #230:   Year 1969


Rape:: 50% Black
Robbery:: 66% Black
Murder:: 65% Black



Table #312:     Year 1978

Rape:: 49% Black
Robbery:: 59% Black
Murder:: 59% Black


Blacks in 1978 were approximately 11% of America's population


-----------------------------------------

How violent has the black male become under the new Compulsory Inclusionism system?

From  1964 and 2011, black males in the age group of 15 to 35, which represents approximately 2.2% of America's population ,  committed more homicides than all the US war casualties during the entire 20th century.

451,295 Total Homicides attributable to black males from 1965 to 2011

  How the 451,295 was computed::  There were 843,543 homicides in the US between 1965 & 2011.  Blacks, on average,  have been arrested in the category for murder in every consecutive year from 1965 to 2011 at between 50% to  60%. I decided to use a mean ave. of 54.3% for black homicides from 1965 to 2011.  
So, 843,543 x .535 = 451, 295 


Breakdown of total US murders by decade:
1965 to 1970 US murders= 77, 800
1971 to 1980 US murders= 199,270 


1981 to 1995 US murders= 303, 769  
 

1995 to 2011 US murders= 262, 734 



Continuing to build this site...

Sunday, July 3, 2011

Black Males & Their Historical Crime Rates

Note: I'm going to break this blog into a two parts series.  


--Part I  will contain facts and statistics for the black males in the area of crime while the USA operated under the historic formula for a societal structure, which I will refer to, for lack of a better description, as the DMG Theorem. Link 


--Part II  will demonstrate what effect  Compulsory Inclusionism (Civil Rights Acts 1964, 65' and 68') has had on black male crime rates. 


>>>Blacks Lynching Blacks  - Truth About Lynching - LINK<<<
                          >>> Why Negro Were Lynched - LINK<<<


                                                   ----------------------------------------
Part I
                                                   ----------------------------------------  


 
    According to the U.S. Census for 1900 ... the Negro population was 8,833,994... and 87%  of the Negroes still lived in the South.   The total urban Negro population in America was 11%.  It was also around 1900 that industrialization was beginning its ascent in America.  By the end of the 1950s, the majority of America's blacks were now living in Anglo-created urban centers ( in 1960 ... 56% of Negroes in the South lived in cities, in the North, 96%,  and West, over 93% of Negroes lived in urban centers). 


  NEVER in human history had a single society experienced more economic prosperity than America did during the 1950s.  


In 1960, the American Negro population reached almost 19 million.  As of 1960:


-- there are 1,551 U.S. cities ...total number built by American Negroes: -0-
-- number of industries established by Negro males: -0-
-- number of tax bases created by Negro males capable of sustaining gov't services: -0-


-- total number of residential housing structures built by Negro males in major metropolitan centers: So minute statistically immeasurable

-- number of white males & females employed by a Negro and supporting a family: -0- (I have not found a single case)

--total number of Negro male registered businesses: 34,400 (in other words, only .0043 of all adult black males owned their own business in 1960-  all are mom & pop operations. Source: Chronological History of the Negro -pg 523)

-- total amount of monies generated by Negro businesses that contributed to the US tax base (1960): So minute statistically immeasurable/ inconsequential

-- number of Negroes employed by a white person (household/corporation/business) or the white tax base: 99% of all wage earning black males worked for a white business/ corporation, household or the white tax base (i.e. the tax base = monies generated from businesses & industries in 1960 by federal, state local governments).


Clearly the Negro race in American history up until 1960 had demonstrated demonstrably different behavioral characteristics when compared to White males. More specifically, while one race provided for themselves and their people within America's urban centers, the other discernibly failed to do so.  This failing is undoubtedly a  major  contributor to the urban Negro crime rates  represented  below. 

Note: Regarding no cities built by the Negro race, by contrast, in 1820 the American population (i.e. white people) was approx. 8.5 million , the approximate size of the Negro population in 1900,  and American males had already by then built 61 cities (2000 or more inhabitants). SOURCE

---------------------------------------------------


1898


 W.E.B Du Bois: 

"In the city of Philadelphia the increasing number of bold and daring crimes committed by Negroes [since 1890] has focused the city on this subject. There is a widespread feeling that something is wrong with a race that is responsible for so much crime, and that strong remedies are called for. One has but to visit the corridors of the public buildings, when the courts are in session, to realize the part played in law-breaking by the Negro."
    Book: The Philadelphia Negro - 1898  (pg. 241)


---------------------------------------------------


1. 

 Regarding rape:  The penalty for a rape conviction in the USA from 1900 to 1970,  particularly for a black male and the victim was white, was not always death.  It was most likely a lengthly prison term.  In the state of Virginia, for example, between 1900 and 1960, out of 288 rape cases involving black males raping white females, only 50 (22%) were executed by the state (17 were lynched).

http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-67829800.html
  ---------------------------------------------------
2.      
1904



Negro prison statistics for 1904...LINK


---------------------------------------------------

Comparison Of Negro And American Prisoners For Some Major US Cities For 1910
LINK  (pg, 80)

Even though only 11% of the Negro population was living in the American-built urban centers, note in the link above the great disparity in the incarceration rates of American (white) & Negro.

--------------------------------------------------
3.                  
1923 



 According to the far-left leaning Sentencing Project:

 "In 1926, for example, Black Americans comprised barely 21 percent of the prison population. But in each subsequent decade, with almost clock-work precision, the percentage has increased by an average of five percent."

Is this statement accurate? Let's check...  


  I cannot find prison figures for 1926 where there is a racial breakdown ( I would like to know the source used by The Sentencing Project, as I have pored over the gov't statistical abstracts- NOTHING); however, I did find prison records for 1923.  In 1923, according to the gov't statistics above, blacks (including females) are - oops - not 21% ... but rather 31% of America's prisoners (figure includes those present in county jails). So blacks in American prisons in 1923 - during the roaring 20s economic boom! - are disproportionately represented at more than 3 times their population count. No one should doubt that in 1926 blacks were represented at approximately the same percent in the prison system. 

Note: Between 1933 and 1939 black males were imprisoned at a rate of about 24% for each successive year.  

---------------------------------------------------
4.
1941 and 1943 




Between 1941 and 1943 blacks are - AGAIN -  being imprisoned at rate of approx. 30%.  

------------------------------------------------------- 
5.


1950 and 1960, US prison by race




In 1950, black males are now  35% of US prison population (including local jails).

In 1960, black males are 38% of the total US prison  population (local jails included).

--------------------------------------------------

6.                                
                                                          

Time Magazine 1958: The Negro Crime Rate : A Failure In Integration

                        http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,810262-1,00.html


NYC = Black 14% of city population. Of those arrested in 1957, 44% black males; 65% black female.

Chicago = Black 15% of city population. 49% of all the predatory crimes of rape, robbery and murder are attributed to blacks.

Los Angeles (city) = Black 13% of city population.  48% of all arrests for predatory crimes of rape, robbery and murder are attributed to blacks.

Detroit = Black 25% of city population.  In the county of Detroit, 66% of the person in its jail systems are black. Of all arrests in the county, 50% are black.

Wait a minute now.  For those of you you have been reading my blogs, you know Time Magazine's title 'The Negro Crime Rate : A Failure In Integration'   is a flagrant misnomer. Integration (by force) was created on July 2, 1964 (Civil Rights Act).  So the Negro males' crime rates represented  here cannot be a failure in integration. It is rather, a failure of the black male in urban centers. 

 ---------------------------------------------------

7.  

During the 1950s,  arguably the BIGGEST economic boom in all of human history is taking place, and it's taking place in America.  Yet, America's Negroes are not just faltering. They are withering is desolation and despair.  This, of course, is not a plot conceived by the white man.  White males were, and always had been,  the major source of employment for the Negro (male and female),  and also took it  upon themselves  - because the Negro would not or could not -  to built housing for them (public housing).  White males also provided through their tax base a welfare system to feed the Negroes who were hungry.  

Remember, the black race was supposed to be separate and self-reliant as a people i.e. they were SUPPOSED to build their own towns, cities, industries, tax base, create their own political titles, or, if they truly felt oppressed, colonize a place in America e.g. like the Mormons did.  One distinct people living separate from another distinct people was the established norm throughout human history.  

 
Journalist Theodore H. White describes life in Chicago for the Negro in 1956 as follows:

“… Fifteen to 25 per cent [Negroes] unemployed here; one quarter of [Negro] families in some [census] tracts without fathers; of 17,000 Negro births in Chicago, an estimated 4,000 illegitimate.”

“… of all the women in Chicago's county jail, 69 per cent are Negro; of all the men, 62 per cent; of all the forlorn on relief, 72 per cent Negro; of all the clients of public housing in Chicago, seeking shelter of the government, 70 per cent Negro. And in Detroit, Philadelphia, New York, kindred figures grimly repeat themselves.”
 
 http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/6331/
 ---------------------------------------------------
8.
1958


The page below is a copy taken directly from the Government Statistical Abstracts and is the earliest crime statistics I could find produced by the federal gov't which breaks down crime by race.

In 1958 Negroes were about 11% of the total US population.   We are shown here for the first time what white people in the 1950s very likely already suspected regarding Negro violent crime.  

Year 1958

Rape:: 46% Black
Robbery:: 54% Black
Murder:: 61% Black
------------------------------------------------

9.                


1960



Was the Negro violent crime statistics for the year 1958 just an anomaly ? Below are 1960 stats.

 Note: Murder non-negligence implied intentional murder. Negligent homicide is a reduced charge, implying non-intent to murder the victim.

Year 1960

Rapes:: 52%  Black
Robbery:: 56% Black
Murder:: 56%  Black


Here's something that you should find interesting.  In this following table, note the substantial drop in predatory crimes (rapes, robbery, murder) when black males live in a rural environment.

* Again, black males are 10% of the US male population.

Year 1960 (rural predatory crimes)

Rapes:: 19%  Black
Robbery:: 23% Black
Murder:: 37%  Black
-------------------------------------------------

10.      


1963



Between 1930 and 1963, of the 3833 executions carried out by states and the federal gov't :
--54%  were black.
--90% of all executions for Rape were black.   


 ---------------------------------------------------
11. 

The above statistics, as everyone can plainly see, show a very clear propensity on the part of the Negro male (between 1900 and 1960) to commit violent crimes, and particularly within urban centers. However,  let's keep this in mind:: 
  • the percentage of black males between 16 and 35 in the prison system was within the acceptable range for cooperation from a male group.1
Let's do the math.   First, let's take a look at the percentage of black & white males represented in the state and federal prison system in 1960 between the ages 16 to 35.  This age group (16 to 35) within any societal structure would have to cooperate to produce political  & economic stability ( at least that seems reasonable to me as these are the prime years ).  In 1960, the census reported the black population at approx. 18 million. That would mean that approx. 9 million black males lived in the US.  Of that 9 million about 40% would be between the age of 16 and 35 years-old.[1]     So, 40% of 9 million=3.6 million black males between 16 and 35.  Of that 3.6 million in 1960 ...  87,400  black males are in the US prisons (state and federal)That means that approx.  2.4 %  of black males in this age group (16 - 35) are incarcerated within federal & state prisons in the US. 2 

 For white males between 16 and 35, there were approx. 80 million white males total, and, using the same percentages above, 40% of 80 million = 32 million white male between 16 and 35. There were 162,000 white males in the state and federal prison in 1960. So, 162 (k) /32 (m)=.005.  In other words, only one half of one percent - .05% - of white males in our stated age group are incarcerated in state and federal prisons in 1960.   


Note: A "male group" are males racially, linguistically and religiously similar.

1.  While there is no generally accepted percentage for a male group to cooperate to maintain stability within a society, we can, however, look at the Continental Army during the American Revolution and at least get a rudimentary approximation as to what percentage of a male group who chose to no longer cooperate with the status quo, can result in the collapse of the political system (in our case, the British colonial system).  The American population in 1780 was approx. 2.7 million.  Half of that number would be males.  Using our 40% figure for males between 16 and 35, the age group that would comprise virtually the entire fighting force for the Continental Army, that would mean that there would be approx. 450,000 American males available to Washington to fight the British.  However, only about 20,000 of that number ever fought with Washington.  In other words, it took only about 4% of the males between 16 and 35 to bring down the whole British colonial system.  Again, blacks in 1960, their prison rate – non-cooperation rate - for the age group 16 to 35, is approx. 2.4%. White males, it’s at .005 approx. Ergo, for both male groups (white & black), both are in the acceptable cooperation range.

Note:  Negro males, with the exception of a few incidents,  did not fight in the Continental Army.


2.  I am factoring in the mean life expectancy for black & white male's between 1900 and 1960.  For blacks, it was about 55 years.  For whites, about 64 years.




-----------------------------------------------------------------------


PART II
-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Black Male Crime Statistics
Under  'New'
System
 (1964 to present)
                                        --------------------------------------------------

Why did American Negroes march down America's streets and demand integration rights into political and economic systems of a people (White Christians) they were also labeling as their brutal oppressor? Why didn't the Black race demand separation and autonomy?  All of human history suggests a people who claim they are brutally treated and oppressed by another...that's what they should do. But American Blacks didn't do that. They never did it. WHY?   Because Blacks wanted and received the biggest magnanimous gesture by one people toward another in human history:  the Black PRIVILEGE --AKA Civil Rights Laws.


The Black PRIVILEGE is embodied in America's civil rights laws ( passed into law by White Christian males) during the Johnson presidency.  Here are some of the PRIVILEGES bestowed on the Black race with the the federal  '64, '65 & '68 Civil Rights Acts.

What the Black race gets:

  • Claim instant access to all economic environments (occupational titles) created by White males
  • Claim instant access to all political environments created by White males 
  • Claim instant access to all residential communities created White males 
  • Receive affirmative action programs (launched in 1965, now includes federal, state & local contract set-asides,  hiring quotas, college admission double standards) 
  • Community development banks (to give loans to black start-up businesses - who have little or no start-up capital) 
  • Small Business Administration (federal agency that gives Blacks favorable treatment, which includes loans for start-up businesses where little or no capital is needed
  • Title VII  race-based lawsuits against White people's businesses and the White tax base 
(note: There was no constitutional right to racial integration, nor was there any historical precedent to it.  From 1900 to to 1964, no economic systems [industries or tax bases] were created by Negroes; nor were there any political systems established, nor were there any urban residential communities built by Negroes)

All of the above Black PRIVILEGES have been going on now for almost 50 years (1965 to 2014).  

When the Black race was given their  - unprecedented in human history -  PRIVILEGES through the civil rights laws (including affirmative action programs), no one should question White Christian males believed that by cooperating with these laws, they were doing something altruistic;  that White males, by not rebelling over the forced integration of their status environments, would allow the Blacks race the necessary income / resources to build their own communities, their own businesses, their own way of life...and finally achieve for the first time in their history in America...  a sense of self-reliance and empowerment as a distinct people.

So, its been 50 years now with all the above Black PRIVILEGES.  How has the Black race used these extraordinary PRIVILEGES to further empowerment and self-reliance for their people, as well as reduce their crime rates? 

Regarding black crime, suffice it to say, the violent crime categories did not go down, but we'll get into that a bit further down,  Two other things I've discovered merit pointing out over this time period (1964 to 2014), that, no doubt in my mind,  has had a profoundly contributory negative effect on the black race as a whole, and severely limited their ability as a racial group to produce self-reliance as a people;  and very likely also contributes to the crime problem so prevalent among the black race since 1964 : 

1) The failure of the Black race to produce businesses across America and employ people - like white males did and continue to do - leaves Black communities, particularly within urban centers, without legitimate economic opportunities. This lack of economic opportunities for black males within their own communities naturally produces too many idol Black males -- which, as one would expect, leads to criminal behavior (Black businesses employ less than  .072  of the total number of people employed in America).SOURCE::

2) Flight of the Black wealthy. No other race flees their own racial/ ethnic group like the African Americans.  Honestly,  does anyone know a multi-millionaire Black male or female who didn't do the Oprah Winfrey? the OJ Simpson? the Beyonce/ JZ?  the Jeremiah Wright? et al.    Just think for a moment ...how much economic activity the Black community is being deprived of by all the wealthy Blacks who flee...flee straight into the White community.

------------

12.

Total Homicides attributable to black males between 1965 to 2011...

 =451,295

How the 451,295 was computed::  There were 843,543 homicides in the US between 1965 & 2011.  Blacks, on average,  have been arrested in the category for murder in every consecutive year from 1965 to 2011 at between 50% to  60%. I decided to use a mean ave. of 54.3% for black homicides from 1965 to 2011.  
So, 843,543 x .535 = 451, 295 


Breakdown of total US murders by decade (derived from the US census):

1965 to 1970 US murders= 77, 800
1971 to 1980 US murders= 199,270 


1981 to 1995 US murders= 303, 769  
 

1995 to 2011 US murders= 262, 734 




SOURCE
---------------------------------------------------


13.
1969 to 1978






TABLE #230:   Year 1969


Rape:: 50% Black
Robbery:: 66% Black
Murder:: 65% Black


-----------------------------------------------------------

Table #312:     Year 1978

Rape:: 49% Black
Robbery:: 59% Black
Murder:: 59% Black


Blacks in 1978 were approximately 11% of America's population

----------------------------------------------------------
14.                     
1986

Note: Blacks are approx. 11% of US population in 1986.

"According to the FBI's Uniform Crime Report, in 1986 Blacks accounted for 46.5% of all arrests for violent crimes even though Blacks comprised 12%  of the US population.   Blacks accounted for 48% of the persons arrested for murder; 46.6% of all arrests for rape; 39.8% for assault . . . In 1986, of those person under 18 years of age, Blacks accounted for 54% of those arrested for violent crimes . . . the highest violent crime rates are demonstrated by young Black males. . . . Over 40% of all jail inmates throughout the nation are Black ...and the percentage is rapidly rising.  More young Black men died from homicide in one year (1977) than died in ten years in the Vietnam War "  SOURCE


---------------------------------------------------------
15.                                       
2005


EXPLOSION OF BLACK CRIME AGAINST WHITE PEOPLE 


Seattle Times: "In 2005, there were more than 645,000 victims of inter-racial violent crimes in the U.S.  In 90 percent of those crimes, black offenders attacked white people"  i.e. more than 580,000 white victims.



Source 

-----------------------------------------------
16.     
2013


2013  article by Pat Buchanan on race relations and black racism & crime:  

"In New York from January to June 2008, 83 percent of all gun assailants were black, according to witnesses and victims, though blacks were only 24 percent of the population. Blacks and Hispanics together accounted for 98 percent of all gun assailants.  Forty-nine of every 50 muggings and murders in the Big Apple were the work of black or Hispanic criminals."

Also, on RAPE from same article:

After researching the FBI numbers for "Suicide of a Superpower," this writer concluded: "An analysis of 'single offender victimization figures' from the FBI for 2007 finds blacks committed 433,934 crimes against whites, eight times the 55,685 whites committed against blacks. Interracial rape is almost exclusively black on white — with 14,000 assaults on white women by African Americans in 2007. Not one case of a white sexual assault on a black female was found in the FBI study."

SOURCE

----------------------------------------------



 Continuing to build this site...


Friday, June 3, 2011

NAACP and Their Pro Bono Lawyers

  
Dominant Male Group Theorem and historical structure of a human society:  
Prior to 1964, all human societies in recorded history basically followed the same pattern to their establishment, which was homogeneity in their race, language and religion. These characteristics undoubtedly played a vital role in maintaining stability within the society. For example, note how few civil wars have been recorded since the time of the ancient Greeks (regarding the American Civil War, as president Lincoln said to a group of prominent Negroes "..consider what we know to be the truth. But for your race among us there could not be war.").1
Since all of human history demonstrates a predispose male grouping behavior in the establishment of a society, as well as its continuation (at least I cannot find a single exception in recorded human history), let's express this grouping pattern for the establishment of a society in the following way::

When a male group (males similar racially, linguistically and religiously) establishes claim to a geographic area, this group then seeks to create a society. A society must have a social stratification system; and when that social stratification system exists ... a society is then formed. When the society is formed the male group that created it becomes the Dominant Male Group. There are two primary functions a society serves, which allows it to achieve stability and longevity: (1) stratify the Dominant Male Group; (2) perpetuate the Dominant Male Group.

Again, there is no known deviation from the above grouping behavior for establishing a society's social strata (that I'm aware of) prior to 1964.
Females historic role within a society: Prior to 1964, throughout human history females had always been separated from the males; and never allowed into the male group's social strata. Female's historic role within a society was simply to procreate for the male group...and to raise the children. Keeping the females separate wasn't - isn't - a pejorative act by males. Females lack 'true status' (as do males outside the DMG). Theoretically then , that is if the DMG theorem is an immutable law of human nature, as all of human history suggest it is, if the social stratification system (systems specifically stratified by occupational titles) created by the DMG is compromised ... the structure itself will become compromised. Collapse of the system would seem to be inevitable.
Do you think America is as stable politically today under the compulsory integration laws than before the laws were passed (specifically, the Civil Rights Acts '64, 65, '68)?


Historical Group Recognition (HGR): In order to build societies throughout human history males from the dominant male group used "group recognition", or HGR. All racial and ethnic groups on our planet ... are here today because of this recognition characteristic.
'True status': The theory behind 'true status' infers that only members of same male group (racially, linguistically, religiously similar)  may have status in a male group social stratification system (macro or micro group structure). 


-------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------



NAACP

From the NAACP's beginning (1910) to around 1925, in these formative years, and with the organization basically destitute year in and year out, the NAACP was forced to rely on white male attorneys who were willing to work  pro bono (without compensation). There were three lawyers who were willing to do the bulk of this kind work for the advancement of the NAACP ::

-- Albert Enoch Pillsbury (born 1849 - died 1930)

-- Moorfield Storey (born 1849 - died 1930)

-- Arthur Spingarn (born 1878 - died 1971)

Note: black lawyers at that time could not afford to work pro bono.  

   However, there are two things regarding the NAACP in these formative years which I find more than a little troubling (and I hope you do as well)  :: 1) the legal strategy they used; 2) the apparent hypocrisy of the white pro bono attorneys.

1.   Legal Strategy::  Much emphasis is generally given in today's literature to the legal strategy the NAACP' employed in pursuing its lauded integration agenda. However, there is another aspect to this strategy which has been given little importance or recognition (if any) and I think it bears pointing out: the NAACP's  activities were not in any way consistent with existing rules for lawyers in 1910 --   all the way up to 1964 for that matter.  Also never noted is the unprecedented special treatment NAACP lawyers consistently received at the hands of the New York State Bar. That is, what ethical boundaries other lawyers were either forced by their state bar to accept, or morally bound to respect, the NAACP lawyers were always allowed to freely engage in violating. Lawyers (in 1910) were supposed to represent for a fee individuals, companies or, from time to time, a group of any other sort seeking redress over a legal issue or point of law.  Lawyers were not supposed to stir up lawsuits, advertise their services in any media or call upon prospective clients and offer their services pro bono . However, for the NAACP lawyers, when they brazenly stirred up lawsuits, or called upon prospective clients and offered their services pro bono (cases were generally selected based on whether it could create publicity for the organization), they always got a pass.  Perhaps because of the clients the NAACP were pursuing, ones that could never afford to pay a fee for lawyer services, the New York Bar allowed these guys to get away with all their ethics violations. However, the following point still needs to be driven home here: For lawyers to work for an organization, and where the primary purpose of that organization is to stir up lawsuits, claiming their efforts are for the "public good", was, prior to 1910, unprecedented in America, as well as in every other Western Civilization country. 1

2.  
 Hypocrisy::  I have also found it very troubling that the white pro bono lawyers for the NAACP (as well as all the other members of the NAACP who were white), who worked for or on behalf of this organization - which promoted racial integration - were unwilling themselves to practice what they were promoting.  In other words, none of the white attorneys for the NAACP were willing to live among the Negro people (Arthur Spingard was a man of considerable wealth who chose to live in an exclusively white community on a palatial estate in upstate New York); nor were they willing to send their children to a predominately Negro school; nor were they ever willing to try to make a living exclusively among the Negro population. Yet, they were essentially telling America’s White population that integration and race-nullification was the right direction for their people; and not only was it the right direction, but the moral one as well.  The way I understand hypocrisy, this does appear to fit the definition. If integration of the races, still an unknown concept in human history at that time (1910 to 1925), was, as the NAACP was claiming, actually the right course to commit to, it does seem that the ones promoting this "radical" new agenda should be the ones at very least practicing it themselves. 

------------------------------------
On July 2, 1964, the political economic system of Compulsory Inclusionism (Civil Rights Act) was created in the USA, and its main purpose was/is to integrate the Dominant Male Group (white Christian males). NOTE: It's also interesting to note that only countries of Western Civilization origin have established - thru written laws - a compulsory integration system. (the ability of white males to become slaves to their written laws...never ceases to amaze me)
AGAIN, do you think America is as stable politically today under the compulsory integration laws than before the laws were passed (e.g. Civil Rights Acts '64, 65, '68)?

----------

Are the following Links notable *consequences* when a DMG allows encroachment into their social stratification system?
1) LINK...
2) OJ Simpson Double Murder/ Acquittal (black jury)...
3) LINK
4) Why do blacks continue to fail? Well, ...it's got to be white people's fault - they're "born to be racist" LINK
5) 1947... Mendez, et al v. Westminister School District of Orange County (CA)... Hispanics won the case for a desegregated school... Guess what? The school is 100% Hispanic today...and they aren't complaining one bit! LINK

6) MASSACRE LINK

-------------------------------------

NOTE: In the 100 years existence of the NAACP, there has yet to be a documented case of a white male / female member of this organization that moved from their predominantly White community into a predominantly black community. 2

------------------------------------
Lincoln (1862): "We look to our condition, owing to the existence of the two races on this continent. I need not recount to you the effects upon white men, growing out of the institution of Slavery. I believe in its general evil effects on the white race. See our present condition---the country engaged in war!---our white men cutting one another's throats, none knowing how far it will extend; and then consider what we know to be the truth. But for your race among us there could not be war...  It is better for us both, therefore, to be separated."

1. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/l/lincoln/lincoln5/1:812?rgn=div1;view=fulltext

2. I could not find a single documented case. If someone knows of a case(s), please include it below in the comment section (with a source).